A year ago, Bror Saxberg and I penned the book Breakthrough Leadership in the Digital Age. I鈥檓 pretty fond of the volume (you can check it out ). Anyway, I鈥檝e had several opportunities of late to spend time with some folks creating some really impressive digital and tech-enabled tools for learning. But then I listen to some of the really enthusiastic cheerleaders and I get nervous. It all put me in the mood to share a revised version of a piece that Bror and I penned a little while back for National Review. So here you go:
It鈥檚 hard to talk about schools today without talking about technology. Enthusiasts celebrate the wonders of tablets, virtual schools, and 鈥渂lended鈥� learning. Skeptics recall a litany of overhyped, underwhelming past efforts.
News accounts are rife with breathless tales of digital learning. Remember the Forbes cover story 鈥淥ne Man, One Computer, 10 Million 69传媒: How Khan Academy Is Reinventing Education鈥�? The thing is, we鈥檝e been there before, plenty of times. Indeed, in 1922, Thomas Edison proclaimed, 鈥淭he motion picture is destined to revolutionize our educational system. . . . In a few years it will supplant largely, if not entirely, the use of textbooks.鈥� Edison鈥檚 enthusiasm is a familiar phenomenon.
In 1931, U.S. Commissioner of Education William Cooper established a radio section in the U.S. Office of Education. By 1932, nine states were broadcasting regular educational programs and Benjamin Darrow, author of Radio: The Assistant Teacher, touted radio as a 鈥渧ibrant and challenging textbook of the air.鈥� Similar stories can be told about TV, the desktop computer, laptops, and much else.
Indeed, we know of only one learning technology that has actually transformed teaching and learning: the book.
When it was first introduced, educators found it disconcerting and of dubious value. Over time, though, they came to cherish it for its two great strengths. First, it gave students access to experts from around the world; children were no longer dependent solely on their teachers for learning. Second, no longer reliant on teachers to tell them everything, students could learn at home or on their own. This 鈥渇lipped鈥� the classroom, allowing teachers to spend less time lecturing and more time explaining, mentoring, and facilitating.
The book first became available to the masses after the invention of the printing press in the mid-1400s. Previously, teachers and students had relied on painstakingly hand-inscribed parchment. As statistician Nate Silver has observed, 鈥淎lmost overnight, the cost of producing a book decreased by about three hundred times, so a book that might have cost $20,000 in today鈥檚 dollars instead cost $70.鈥� The availability of books skyrocketed.
Educators today have expressed plenty of questions about new technologies, so it鈥檚 useful to recall that educators also didn鈥檛 exactly welcome the printing press. 69传媒 were predominantly church-run affairs, and religious leaders worried about the lack of moral and interpretive guidance for learners left to their own devices.
There were also fears that printed books would be a poor, cheap substitute for the rich experience of reading a scribe-written book. In 1492, abbot Johannes Trithemius fretted about the loss of 鈥渄evotion to the writing of sacred texts. . . . Printed books will never equal scribed books, especially because the spelling and ornamentation of some printed books is often neglected.鈥�
Despite these concerns, the book鈥檚 merits won out. The book made it possible to rethink the teacher鈥檚 role and launched an 鈥渋nformation revolution.鈥� Before books, students could learn only as much as their own teacher could convey. With books, students could master content and concepts outside of school, learning even when a teacher wasn鈥檛 there to tell them things. (Think of Abraham Lincoln working his way through Shakespeare and the Greeks alone on the Illinois prairie.)
Books enable students to move at their own pace and to re-read passages as needed, permitting the kind of reinforcement that learners need. Books make it possible for students to learn in the evening, when they鈥檙e ill, or even when assigned to an inept teacher. In each case, of course, books may well be inferior to a lesson delivered by a phenomenal instructor. But for most students, books are a huge improvement over the alternative.
That said, there are plenty of classrooms where students sit hunched doing busywork out of tedious textbooks. There are too many classrooms where instruction consists of teachers parroting the textbook, or having the class take turns reading passages aloud. The presence of the book matters less than its quality, and how it鈥檚 used. The same can be said for tablets, smartphones, smartboards, and any other eye-catching new technology.
The book provides an invaluable template for how to best think about digital learning. Promising education technologies won鈥檛 鈥渇ix鈥� schools or replace terrific teachers. Instead, they make it possible to reshape the teacher鈥檚 job, so that teachers and students have more opportunity for personalized, dynamic learning.
How can we expand on the book鈥檚 transformation of education? Well, the book has real limitations. 69传媒 learn best when eye and ear work in tandem鈥攂ut books are a silent medium. Books are fixed, providing the same experience to every reader, every time. The material and language will inevitably be too difficult for some readers and too easy for others.
Books can鈥檛 offer a live demonstration or a new explanation to a confused reader. Online materials can be rapidly updated, are customizable to a student鈥檚 interests and reading level, and feature embedded exercises that let students apply new concepts and get immediate feedback. Virtual instruction makes it possible for students to access real, live teachers unavailable at their school; this can be a haven for some students, especially those reluctant to ask questions in class.
Researchers have found that intelligent, computer-assisted tutoring systems are about 90 percent as effective as in-person tutors. None of this will happen just by giving out iPads or mouthing platitudes about 鈥渇lipped classrooms.鈥� Rather, it requires getting three crucial things right.
First, new tools should inspire a rethinking of what teachers, students, and schools do, and how they do it. If teaching remains static, sprinkling hardware into schools won鈥檛 much matter.
Second, technology can鈥檛 be something that鈥檚 done to educators. Educators need to be helping to identify the problems to be solved and the ways technology can help, and up to their elbows in making it work.
Third, it鈥檚 not the tools but what鈥檚 done with them. When they discuss what鈥檚 working, the leaders of high-tech charter school systems like Carpe Diem and Rocketship Education, or heralded school districts like that of Mooresville, N.C., brush past the technology in order to focus relentlessly on learning, people, and problem-solving.
All of this is too often missed when tech enthusiasts promise miracles and tech skeptics lament that technology is an 鈥渁ttack on teachers.鈥� What to make of such claims? The book didn鈥檛 work miracles or hurt teachers. It did allow us to reimagine teaching and learning, even if we鈥檙e still struggling to capitalize on that opportunity five centuries later. Here鈥檚 hoping we do better this time.