69传媒

Law & Courts

A District鈥檚 Rule Against Misgendering 69传媒 Is Likely Constitutional

By Mark Walsh 鈥 July 30, 2024 4 min read
Demonstrators advocating for transgender rights and healthcare stand outside of the Ohio Statehouse, Jan. 24, 2024, in Columbus, Ohio. A federal appeals court on Wednesday, July 17, refused to lift a judge's order temporarily blocking the Biden administration鈥檚 new Title IX rule meant to expand protections for LGBTQ+ students
  • Save to favorites
  • Print
Email Copy URL

A divided federal appeals court refused to block an Ohio school district鈥檚 rules that bar students from using pronouns that misgender their classmates. The policy, the court said, likely does not violate the First Amendment rights of students with religious beliefs that there is no such thing as a gender transition.

鈥淭ransgender students experience the use of non-preferred pronouns as dehumanizing and 鈥 as a result, the repeated use of such pronouns can have severely negative effects on children and young adults,鈥 said the majority opinion on July 29 by a 2-1 panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, in Cincinnati.

The court said the intentional use of preferred or nonpreferred pronouns is speech under the First Amendment, but the policies of the 24,000-student Olentangy school district were likely justified by the need to eliminate disruption and protect transgender students. The court rejected an injunction to block the rules sought by the national group Parents Defending Education on behalf of several district parents who argued that their children should not be required to use pronouns that conflict with their beliefs that there are only two biological-based genders.

鈥淧erhaps the single thing on which the parties agree is that pronouns matter,鈥 said the majority opinion by Judge Jane B. Stranch, an appointee of President Barack Obama. 鈥淭hat is true for transgender students in the district, who experience the use of preferred pronouns as a vital part of affirming their existence and experience the use of non-preferred pronouns as dehumanizing, degrading, and humiliating. It is also true for [the plaintiff] children, whose parents aver that using pronouns inconsistent with a person鈥檚 biological sex at birth contradicts their 鈥榙eeply held beliefs鈥 about the immutability of sex.鈥

The opinion was joined by Judge Stephanie D. Davis, an appointee of President Joe Biden.

A school district鈥檚 rules are interpreted to bar misgendering, but it offers some alternatives

In 2023, the Olentangy district north of Columbus revised several of its policies to add protections against gender-identity discrimination. When a parent asked in an email whether their 鈥渄evoutly Christian child who believes in two biological genders鈥 would 鈥渂e forced to use the pronouns that a transgender child identifies with or be subject to reprimand from the district,鈥 a district lawyer responded that a student 鈥減urposefully referring to another student by using gendered language they know is contrary to the other student鈥檚 identity鈥 would be discrimination under the district鈥檚 policies.

Parents Defending Education, which is involved in several similar cases across the country, sued on behalf of several parents in the district, arguing that the policies violated the First Amendment鈥檚 free-speech clause by impermissibly compelling speech, regulating speech based on viewpoint and content, and imposing overbroad restrictions on speech.

A federal district court last year denied a preliminary injunction to block the district鈥檚 policies. In its July 29 decision in , the 6th Circuit affirmed the lower court.

鈥淓ven this limited preliminary injunction record contains evidence of the substantial disruption that repeated, intentional use of non-preferred pronouns to refer to transgender students can cause,鈥 Stranch wrote for the majority.

The court rejected the compelled-speech argument by the plaintiffs, noting that the school district has said no student would be compelled to use pronouns aligning with a transgender student鈥檚 gender identity. Instead, the student could use the classmate鈥檚 first name or avoid using pronouns altogether, the district said.

The appeals court rejected the viewpoint-discrimination argument because the district鈥檚 policies prohibit harassment, misconduct, and other disruptive speech across a variety of categories and it allows students to express the viewpoint that sex is immutable by several means other than 鈥渢he use of non-preferred pronouns.鈥 For example, the district said in court proceedings that it would allow a student to wear a T-shirt with the message, 鈥淕ender is not fluid,鈥 the court said.

Judge Alice M. Batchelder, an appointee of President George H.W. Bush, dissented, saying 鈥淭he First Amendment forbids the district from compelling students to use speech that conveys a message with which they disagree, namely that biology does not determine gender.鈥

The district鈥檚 suggestion that objecting students use no pronouns was 鈥渁wkward鈥 and 鈥渞equires the speaker to recognize and accept that gender transition is a real thing.鈥

鈥淩egardless of whether students can also discuss gender ideology in the abstract鈥攚hich is also protected speech鈥攖he students鈥 protected speech here is their use of biological pronouns to affirm their own belief that people are either male or female and that a child cannot 鈥榯ransition鈥 from one sex to another,鈥 Batchelder said.

Events

School & District Management Webinar Crafting Outcomes-Based Contracts That Work for Everyone
Discover the power of outcomes-based contracts and how they can drive student achievement.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Harnessing AI to Address Chronic Absenteeism in 69传媒
Learn how AI can help your district improve student attendance and boost academic outcomes.
Content provided by 
School & District Management Webinar EdMarketer Quick Hit: What鈥檚 Trending among K-12 Leaders?
What issues are keeping K-12 leaders up at night? Join us for EdMarketer Quick Hit: What鈥檚 Trending among K-12 Leaders?

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide 鈥 elementary, middle, high school and more.
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.

Read Next

Law & Courts The Uncertainty Ahead for Title IX and Transgender 69传媒 in Trump's New Term
Trump may not be able to withdraw the Title IX rule on "Day 1," but advocates on both sides expect it to go away.
7 min read
Marshall University students hold a protest to voice concerns over the handling of Title IX-related issues at the university on Nov. 18, 2022, in Huntington, W.Va.
Marshall University students hold a protest to voice concerns over the handling of Title IX-related issues at the university on Nov. 18, 2022, in Huntington, W.Va.
Sholten Singer/The Herald-Dispatch via AP
Law & Courts Ten Commandments Law for Public 69传媒 Is 'Impermissible,' Judge Rules
The Louisiana law would require displays of the Ten Commandments in every public school classroom.
4 min read
Photo of Ten Commandments poster on school wall.
Getty
Law & Courts Supreme Court Weighs High-Stakes Fraud Issue for E-Rate Program
The justices appear to lean toward a ruling that could help keep schools from being overcharged by telecommunications companies.
8 min read
Image of students working on a computer.
Carlos Barquero Perez/iStock/Getty
Law & Courts Court Battles and Presidential Election Have Big Implications for Title IX Regulation
A federal appeals court heard arguments about whether some provisions of the Title IX regulation should be allowed to go into wider effect.
4 min read
Image of a gavel
iStock/Getty