69传媒

Law & Courts

Districts鈥 Boys-Only Programs Prompt Legal Questions

By Corey Mitchell 鈥 March 03, 2015 5 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print
Email Copy URL

The American Civil Liberties Union and a District of Columbia council member are questioning the legality of plans for an all-boys public high school that they say may violate federal protections meant to ensure equality for young women.

The proposed school in Washington is part of a $20 million initiative announced by District of Columbia Mayor Muriel E. Bowser and the city鈥檚 schools chancellor, Kaya Henderson, to boost academic achievement and graduation rates among black and Hispanic boys.

Dozens of big-city districts are ramping up an array of similar new programs that focus specifically on improving the academic and social-emotional outcomes for boys of color鈥攚idely praised efforts that are also drawing concerns over whether girls of color are being unfairly left behind.

The ACLU鈥檚 challenge to the District of Columbia effort is the latest in the group鈥檚 yearslong campaign to identify segregated classes, schools, and extracurricular activities that violate Title IX of Education Amendments of 1972 and the equal-protection clause of the U.S. Constitution.

While operating single-sex initiatives is legal, U.S. Department of Education guidelines say that public schools that segregate by gender must offer 鈥渟ubstantially equal鈥 benefits for the opposite sex.

School districts for years have undertaken initiatives to address the lagging achievement of black boys.

鈥淭here are very good reasons for that [attention], but minority girls often aren鈥檛 included,鈥 said Galen L. Sherwin, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU鈥檚 Women鈥檚 Rights Project. 鈥淩esources should be offered to at-need students regardless of their sex.鈥

President Barack Obama鈥檚 鈥淢y Brother鈥檚 Keeper鈥 program, a bid for the federal government to offer greater assistance to minority men, added a sense of urgency to the issue and is fueling more discussion of all-boys programs.

The Oakland, Calif., school system, which launched an effort in 2010 to boost achievement for black boys, is among the districts that initially relied on foundation funding to avoid running afoul of Title IX and the equal-protection clause. Title IX requires gender equity for boys and girls in educational programs that receive federal funding.

In the nation鈥檚 capital, the 鈥淓mpowering Males of Color鈥 initiative will be at least partially funded through private donations and will include a mentoring program and targeted grants to schools to improve academic development and family engagement. The district plans to partner with Urban Prep Academies, a nonprofit that runs three highly regarded all-boys high schools in Chicago, to operate its new high school for boys.

What About Girls?

The ACLU sent a letter last month to Mayor Bowser asking how the city would balance benefits for girls. The school district declined to comment on the complaint.

The Washington-based Council of the Great City 69传媒鈥攚hich represents 67 of the nation鈥檚 largest school districts鈥攊s a partner with President Obama on My Brother鈥檚 Keeper. The District of Columbia school system is among the member districts that pledged to take up targeted programs for minority boys.

Single-sex education is generally prohibited under Title IX. But in 2006, the Education Department loosened guidelines to allow districts to create single-gender schools and classes, so long as enrollment is voluntary.

The department issued new guidance last December clarifying the circumstances under which coeducational schools could offer female-only or male-only classes. But to make the case that many programs fall short of federal requirements, the ACLU has filed complaints and raised questions about gender-specific initiatives from coast to coast, including programs in Alabama, Maine, Mississippi, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.

School officials in Lawrence, Kan., recently expanded a mentoring program for high school boys to include all students after the ACLU argued that its male-only program caused 鈥渟ignificant harm鈥 to girls.

How girls will receive comparable offerings should be hashed out well before school administrators roll out programs, said Fatima Goss Graves, the vice president of education and employment at the National Women鈥檚 Law Center in Washington.

鈥淭hese are the sorts of questions you need to ask in advance, not after,鈥 Ms. Goss Graves said.

Many advocates of single-sex education support the practice based on the belief that girls and boys learn differently.

The question of what the District of Columbia system would offer as a 鈥渟ubstantially equal鈥 benefit for girls to counter the all-boys high school prompted city councilor Mary M. Cheh to seek a legal opinion from the city鈥檚 attorney general.

Boys in Peril

Some Washington leaders have come to the initiative鈥檚 defense, arguing that boys of color in the city are in peril. School district data show black and Hispanic boys lagging behind other student groups on multiple measures of performance. The rates at which black and Hispanic boys graduate from high school in four years are 48 percent and 57 percent, respectively.

While black and Hispanic girls in the District of Columbia performed better than their male peers last year, at 62 percent and 66 percent, respectively, they lagged far behind white girls and boys, whose four-year graduation rates were 91 percent and 82 percent, respectively.

Meanwhile, the Oakland district鈥檚 Office of African American Male Achievement, with its manhood-development classes, has emerged as a national model, notably for its success in raising grades and attendance while reducing behavioral problems. Like other single-sex programs, though, Oakland鈥檚 effort has faced legal questions.

To avoid violating Title IX, then-Superintendent Tony Smith first created the cabinet-level office with private funding. Christopher Chatmon, the office鈥檚 executive director, worked outside the district until 2012. That鈥檚 when the Oakland school board agreed to five years of federal monitoring as the district works to reduce high suspension rates for black students. The district faced a legal and moral quandary: risk running afoul of Title IX and the equal-protection clause or continue to allow what Mr. Smith called 鈥渋nstitutional oppression and racism鈥 that restricted educational opportunities.

鈥淲e were breaking federal law in how we suspend black boys and how we referred them to special education,鈥 said Mr. Chatmon, who estimates that his office is 60 percent foundation-funded, with tax dollars covering the balance of its $1 million-plus budget.

Federal guidelines do allow single-sex classes, schools, or extracurricular activities if they are designed to meet a government interest, such as reducing suspension rates for black students, according to the Education Department.

Under the monitoring agreement, Oakland must offer mentoring, teacher training, and parent education programs. Mr. Chatmon鈥檚 office also aims to boost average attendance for black boys by 75 percent, double their graduation rate, and close a huge 4th grade literacy gap.

鈥淭he focus on black boys is predicated on the data,鈥 Mr. Chatmon said. 鈥淣obody is preventing someone from doing similar work with other students.鈥

A version of this article appeared in the March 04, 2015 edition of Education Week as Boys-Only Programs Raise Legal Concerns

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Artificial Intelligence Webinar
AI and Educational Leadership: Driving Innovation and Equity
Discover how to leverage AI to transform teaching, leadership, and administration. Network with experts and learn practical strategies.
Content provided by 
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School Climate & Safety Webinar
Investing in Success: Leading a Culture of Safety and Support
Content provided by 
Assessment K-12 Essentials Forum Making Competency-Based Learning a Reality
Join this free virtual event to hear from educators and experts working to implement competency-based education.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide 鈥 elementary, middle, high school and more.
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.

Read Next

Law & Courts Court Battles and Presidential Election Have Big Implications for Title IX Regulation
A federal appeals court heard arguments about whether some provisions of the Title IX regulation should be allowed to go into wider effect.
4 min read
Image of a gavel
iStock/Getty
Law & Courts Top Affirmative Action Foe Has New Target: Scholarships for Aspiring Minority Teachers
The legal activist behind the U.S. Supreme Court college admissions decision has now sued over an Illinois minority scholarship program.
3 min read
A picture of a gavel on a target.
Bill Oxford/Getty
Law & Courts This State Requires 69传媒 to Teach the Bible. Parents and Teachers Are Suing
Opponents of an Oklahoma directive that compels schools to teach the Bible are suing the state鈥檚 superintendent of public instruction.
4 min read
Image of a young boy pulling the bible off of a bookshelf.
D-Keine/E+
Law & Courts States Sue TikTok Over 'Addictive' Design Features. What That Means for 69传媒
The lawsuits are the newest fight targeting social media platforms' algorithms.
3 min read
The United States government laws on certain social media applications such as TikTok
iStock/Getty