Updated: Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry on June 19 signed the legislation requiring a display of the Ten Commandments in every public school classroom, .
69传媒 in Louisiana may soon be required to display the Ten Commandments in their classrooms.
In May, Louisiana that would require all public schools in the state to display the Ten Commandments in every classroom no later than this coming Jan. 1. The bill awaits Republican Gov. Jeff Landry鈥檚 signature.
The Pelican State is the first in recent years to pass a bill requiring schools to display the religious directives. But lawmakers in Arizona, Georgia, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, and West Virginia have all introduced similar bills, none of which has passed yet.
The bills are a part of a growing push to incorporate religion, specifically Christianity, into the public education system as Republican lawmakers have grown more comfortable with policies that mix religion with public education and public funds.
Last year, Louisiana joined 17 states in requiring or explicitly allowing schools to display the national motto, 鈥淚n God We Trust,鈥� on classroom walls. In Oklahoma and Ohio, governors recently have signed laws requiring schools to accommodate students who leave in the middle of the school day to participate in private religious instruction, A number of states in recent years have passed or expanded programs that allow families to spend public funds at private schools of their choice, including religious institutions, which .
And earlier this year in Utah, Republican Gov. Spencer Cox signed a bill that would allow history teachers to use the Ten Commandments and the Magna Carta in curricula. (The original version would have required schools to display the Ten Commandments, but lawmakers amended it after it didn鈥檛 draw enough support.)
鈥淭here鈥檚 definitely a political appetite among some [lawmakers] to bring [religion] into the public sphere,鈥� said Bryan Kelley, a researcher who has studied religion in education. 鈥淐hristian nationalism is a real force that can be seen to have legs, and some politicians are seeing success by campaigning on Christian nationalism and that鈥檚 rewarded by the voters.鈥�
The trend is not unique to the moment. For decades, there have been political debates over lessons about evolution and creationism, the use of the Bible and Ten Commandments as historical text, and prayer in school settings.
But the laws that have passed in recent years鈥攅specially following a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings that have paved the way for public funds to pay for education at religious schools鈥攈ave real implications for educators.
What does the Supreme Court say?
In 1980, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Stone v. Graham that a Kentucky statute requiring school officials to display a copy of the Ten Commandments in public classrooms violated the First Amendment鈥檚 establishment clause, which prohibits the government from establishing a religion through law and is commonly understood as the foundation for the separation of church and state.
On its face, that ruling may make it seem as if any time the Ten Commandments is mentioned or shown in a school building that there鈥檚 been a constitutional violation. But it鈥檚 not that simple, said Derek Black, a constitutional law professor at the University of South Carolina.
鈥淲hat some courts have noted is that context matters,鈥� Black said. The Stone v. Graham ruling 鈥渄oesn鈥檛 mean that the Ten Commandments are a controlled substance that cannot be brought into school.鈥�
For example, teachers can use the Christian tenets alongside other historical documents such as the Justinian Code, the Declaration of Independence, or the Magna Carta to teach students about its historical impact on the founding of societies and governments. It鈥檚 when schools suggest that the Ten Commandments are a moral code that students should follow that they risk violating the Constitution, Black said.
鈥淭here鈥檚 no prohibition on displaying or using the Ten Commandments as you would any other historical document,鈥� he said. 鈥淚t鈥檚 when you elevate them as something more than just a historical document or you isolate them by themselves it seems you鈥檙e endorsing religion.鈥�
In the Louisiana bill, schools would be required to post the Ten Commandments on a poster or framed document that is at least 11 by 14 inches in size, but schools can choose to make the posters bigger or more prominent. The poster is required to 鈥渂e printed in a large, easily readable font,鈥� the law says.
Public schools and universities are also required to include a three-paragraph 鈥渃ontext statement,鈥� explaining the history of the Ten Commandments in the American public education system. The statement, written into the law, explains how the document has been used in education throughout American history, noting various versions of textbooks that have included the Ten Commandments.
The bill also specifies that schools can choose to display the Mayflower Compact, the Declaration of Independence, and the Northwest Ordinance alongside the Ten Commandments, but those documents are not required. It doesn鈥檛 specify which version of the Ten Commandments schools should display or any other religious texts schools may display.
In debate over the bill, lawmakers acknowledged the possibility of a lawsuit challenging the policy and added the 鈥渃ontext statement鈥� and the provision saying schools could display the other historical documents alongside the Ten Commandments in an attempt to bolster the bill鈥檚 legality, .
The bill鈥檚 鈥減urpose is not solely religious,鈥� and the Ten Commandments are 鈥渟imply one of many documents that display the history of our country and foundation of our legal system,鈥� state Sen. Jay Morris, a Republican, told the newspaper.
Despite the 鈥渃ontext statement鈥� requirement and the provision stating schools can display other documents, it鈥檚 notable that the only document schools are required to post is the Ten Commandments, Black said.
鈥淲hat you鈥檙e doing is picking that one out and saying this is the one that must be displayed,鈥� Black said. 鈥淪o what you鈥檙e doing is sort of elevating its status鈥攖hat鈥檚 my words, not the court鈥攂ut you鈥檙e intentionally elevating its status to convey, I think, a religious message and then trying to put a little disclaimer on there.鈥�
While the Stone v. Graham precedent has remained intact since 1980, the Supreme Court has become more sympathetic to the place of religion in public life over the past decade.
A slate of rulings in recent years鈥攎ost notably Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, in which the Supreme Court said that a high school football coach鈥檚 postgame prayers at midfield were protected by the First Amendment鈥檚 free speech and free exercise of religion clauses鈥攈ave likely made lawmakers more comfortable with the idea of passing laws like the Ten Commandments requirement, said Kelley, who previously tracked developments on religion in education as a policy analyst at the Education Commission of the States.
鈥淚n the last 10 years, there鈥檚 been a real step toward encouraging, or at least enabling, religious participation in the public school legal environment by the Supreme Court cases,鈥� Kelley said. Those laws have 鈥渙pened up the door to interested lawmakers who might see what else, that used to seem off the table, could now be on the table.鈥�
What educators should do
Measures like the Louisiana legislation and the state laws requiring schools to display 鈥淚n God We Trust鈥� may make some students and educators uncomfortable, especially if they don鈥檛 believe in God or adhere to a religion that follows the Ten Commandments, Kelley said.
Educators in states with such laws can still promote religious inclusivity and diversity without violating the law, Kelley said.
They might display or teach about other religious texts alongside the Ten Commandments or keep discussions about the Ten Commandments focused on their societal and political implications and avoid characterizing the document as a moral code.
It鈥檚 also important to be aware of a law鈥檚 details, Kelley said. For example, the Kansas law that requires schools to post 鈥淚n God We Trust鈥� didn鈥檛 specify how large the display needed to be.
鈥淪ome people taped up a dollar bill, which says 鈥業n God We Trust,鈥� in a way to comply with the law but not to do something they thought was dogmatic or ostracizing,鈥� Kelley said.
The National Council for the Social Studies has that may help teachers navigate these situations.
鈥淭here鈥檚 certainly a way to talk about religion in a civically minded or historic sense that鈥檚 not proselytizing,鈥� Kelley said.
