Private foundations are playing a growing role in financing the nonprofit educational wings of several prominent K-12 advocacy groups, according to reviews of the foundations鈥� grant records and annual tax filings.
The efforts they underwrite run from the mundane鈥攖ranslating school district materials into Spanish, for instance鈥攖o activities deeply intertwined with policy, such as providing information to parents on topics like teacher evaluation and school choice.
Since 2005, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has donated or pledged some $5.2 million in grants to Stand for Children鈥檚 Leadership Center, including a two-year, $3.5 million grant in 2010 focused primarily on its teacher-quality work. The Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation provided $500,000 in startup costs to 69传媒First and has funded Education Reform Now to the tune of $2 million since 2008.
And beginning in 2010, the Walton Family Foundation has supported all three of those advocacy organizations, including $2.5 million for Stand for Children, $1 million to 69传媒First, and $2.4 million to Education Reform Now, which is associated with the political action committee Democrats for Education Reform.
(The Gates and Walton foundations also provide grant support to Editorial Projects in Education, the nonprofit corporation that publishes Education Week.)
鈥楨cho Chamber鈥�
The confluence of foundation funding to those education advocacy groups has raised concerns among critics, who ask whether such donations amount to working in lockstep to influence policy. The groups have similar positions on some key policy issues, such as the expansion of charter schools and the development of teacher evaluations based in part on student test scores."Because of the amount of money that is available, each of these funded groups wields this ability to speak very, very loudly,鈥� said Kevin G. Welner, a professor in the school of education at the University of Colorado at Boulder. 鈥淎nd because of the sheer number of aligned and interlocking groups, they form a strong network and echo chamber.鈥�
For their part, foundation officials say they are trying to seize a critical moment of national interest in education policy.
鈥淪tand for Children has deep reach that really lines up with some of the foundation鈥檚 other significant investments,鈥� said Debbie Veney Robinson, a spokeswoman for the Seattle-based Gates Foundation. 鈥淲hat they do are things that we don鈥檛 do as an organization鈥攇alvanizing parents and educating parents about education issues, working with community groups.鈥�
In addition, the groups 鈥渁re bringing more horsepower to education reform advocacy, especially through outreach efforts鈥攔ecruiting, acclimating, motivating more advocates,鈥� said Ed Kirby, a senior program officer for the Walton Family Foundation, in Bentonville, Ark. 鈥淥ur view is that we鈥檝e got great advocates doing strong work, but it is still a very undeveloped movement, relative to where it could be and should be.鈥�
The Walton Family Foundation鈥檚 primary goal through its grantmaking is to promote policy attention to school choice, from charters to vouchers to tax credits, Mr. Kirby said. Both 69传媒First and Education Reform Now support private school choice to a degree.
The Gates Foundation鈥檚 most recent grant to Stand for Children, meanwhile, focuses on developing tools to increase teacher effectiveness, a topic that parallels its own research work on that subject.
The grants also come with specific deliverables, though as Mr. Kirby pointed out, it鈥檚 often hard to trace an investment directly to specific policy outcomes.
The deliverables for Gates鈥� support are often tied to such aspects as technical assistance. For instance, Ms. Robinson said, Stand for Children has used its funding to inform parents about the Memphis, Tenn., district鈥檚 inclusion of student feedback as one of several measures in a new teacher-evaluation system.
A spokeswoman for the Los Angeles-based Broad Foundation said that it expects its grantees to 鈥渟trengthen public schools by developing and sharing new research, data, best practices, and perspectives with policymakers, practitioners, and parents so that they can make informed decisions.鈥�
Stance on Lobbying
The question of lobbying is a trickier one. Though they cannot themselves lobby or earmark grants for that purpose, private foundations, including corporate and family foundations, can support charities that do a small amount of lobbying, said Melissa Mikesell, the director of the West Coast office of Alliance for Justice, an organization that provides help on the legal framework for nonprofit and foundation advocacy efforts.
Some private foundations choose to restrict any part of their grant funds from being used to lobby, even though such restrictions are not legally required, she said. For instance, they can specify that their funds support a specific project rather than general operating expenses.
The Gates Foundation is one such foundation that sets those stricter parameters on its grants. 鈥淚t鈥檚 not like we鈥檙e pushing our 鈥榓genda鈥� on people,鈥� Ms. Robinson said. 鈥淚t鈥檚 a really important distinction.鈥�
Regardless of the legal arrangements, however, grantees are generally aware of a particular philanthropy鈥檚 philosophical bent.
鈥淔oundations increasingly have their own theory of change about how they see the world,鈥� Ms. Mikesell said, 鈥渁nd it鈥檚 common for grantees to be attuned to that.鈥�
