69传媒

Blog

Your Education Road Map

Politics K-12庐

Politics K-12 kept watch on education policy and politics in the nation鈥檚 capital and in the states. This blog is no longer being updated, but you can continue to explore these issues on edweek.org by visiting our related topic pages: , .

Federal

How Well Did 69传媒 Implement School Improvement Grants?

By Alyson Klein 鈥 October 28, 2014 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print
Email Copy URL

Back in 2010, the U.S. Department of Education pumped more than $3 billion into the country鈥檚 lowest-performing schools and gave them very specific instructions about how to use the money. So did schools actually implement every aspect of the federal turnaround models?

Not really, according to a on the program just released by the Institute of Education Sciences, the Education Department鈥檚 statistical arm. The report relied on a survey of administrators at low-performing schools, including some that were implementing SIG and some that were not. The survey was conducted in the spring of 2013.

The most interesting finding: None of the schools participating in the survey that used the most common turnaround models available under the Obama administration鈥檚 SIG program鈥"turnaround鈥, which calls for getting rid of the principal and half the staff; and 鈥渢ransformation鈥 which calls for a broad basket of strategies, including extended learning time and performance pay for educators鈥攄id absolutely everything they were encouraged to do.

The researchers also found that:


  • More than 96 percent of schools in the survey have tried the most popular turnaround practices, which include using data to inform instruction, using technology to bolster teaching and learning, and giving educators time to collaborate.
  • 69传媒 were not inclined to use teacher evaluation results to inform compensation. Just a quarter of schools tried that. And less than 24 percent of schools had autonomy over issues like budgeting, the length of the school year, hiring, or discipline.
  • The least popular intervention was using extra compensation to attract turnaround principals. Just under 7 percent of schools attempted this.

The SIG program has posted . Two thirds of schools improved, although some only marginally, after two years in the program. But another third actually slid backwards. Could less-than perfect implementation of the models have been the issue?

Maybe. It鈥檚 also notable that the SIG money was pumped out too quickly for schools, districts, and states to really do any kind of careful planning on how to use the dollars, according to a .

A version of this news article first appeared in the Politics K-12 blog.