Last year, Congress passed the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act in an effort to prevent shootings and address their impacts on schools and communities.
Now, a group of 18 senators and hunting sport advocates say the law has led to an unintended consequence that could threaten funding for school hunting, archery, and sharp shooting programs used in thousands of schools.
The law, which lawmakers passed in the wake of the May 2022 school shooting in Uvalde, Texas, earmarked $1 billion to help schools strengthen school safety and improve and expand mental health services.
In addition, the law amended the Elementary and Secondary Education Act to prohibit schools from using federal education funds to purchase 鈥渄angerous weapons鈥� for use in schools. The Elementary and Secondary Education Act is the primary federal education law, known in its current form as the Every Student Succeeds Act.
The intent of that clause was to prohibit schools from using federal education funds to buy guns for teachers and provide them with training to use them. But a bipartisan group of senators, led by Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., in early September that the agency鈥檚 interpretation of the provision has threatened funding for school archery, hunting, and sharp shooting programs. The issue gained national attention when Fox News published a story that said .
The letter from the group of senators was a response to the department issued in April in which the agency stated that schools cannot use ESEA funds鈥攚hich include key pools of funding such as Title I鈥攖o purchase a 鈥渄angerous weapon,鈥� defined as 鈥渁 weapon, device, instrument, material, or substance, animate or inanimate, that is used for, or is readily capable of, causing death or serious bodily injury.鈥�
鈥淭he Department鈥檚 interpretation has sparked concerns from district and state leaders that ESEA funds may no longer be used to support archery, hunter safety education, or other extracurricular programs,鈥� the senators wrote. 鈥淲e understand the Department has encouraged local and state education agencies to seek alternative sources of funding for archery and hunting educational enrichment programs. This is concerning because of the important role these enrichment programs can play in students鈥� lives.鈥�
Lawmakers in the U.S. House have also that would amend ESEA to clarify that schools could still use the funds to purchase 鈥渁 weapon for purposes of training students in archery, hunting, or other shooting sports.鈥� The bill has not yet passed through committee.
Despite the confusion and fears of funds being withheld, the Education Department has not held back any federal funding from states or school districts as a result of the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, a department spokesperson said. And schools can still seek out funding from other federal grants, state grants, and local funding to support archery and hunting programs, the spokesperson said.
A 鈥榯raffic jam鈥�
The Education Department鈥檚 guidance and the lack of clarity over how federal funds could be used led some school leaders to hold off on carrying out archery and hunting programs in the new school year, said Tommy Floyd, president of the National Archery in the 69传媒 Program. Some schools rely on federal funding to pay for the programs, but even in schools that don鈥檛 use that funding, administrators were worried about the potential of violating federal law, Floyd said.
鈥淓very school administrator takes their budgeting process extremely seriously because so much is at stake,鈥� Floyd said. 鈥淪o any time the U.S. Department of Education gives guidance about anything, people pay attention. 鈥� Until I know the final answer, I鈥檓 probably going to pause. That鈥檚 just being a prudent administrative planner.鈥�
NASP, which is the leading program for archery in U.S. schools, is used in nearly 9,000 schools serving 1.3 million students. It provides curriculum, training for staff, in-school coordinators, and opportunities for competition. Not every school relies on federal funding for the program; some are able to use grants from state education agencies, and NASP itself provides scholarship grants to states, Floyd said.
But the language in the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act made educators wary of starting or continuing archery programs out of fear of violating the law, Floyd said. He compared the resulting impact to a traffic jam.
鈥淲hen we finally get to the source of the traffic jam, we realize it wasn鈥檛 that big of a deal,鈥� he said. 鈥淏ut it was a big deal because it stopped traffic for 2 miles.鈥�
When we finally get to the source of the traffic jam, we realize it wasn鈥檛 that big of a deal. But it was a big deal because it stopped traffic for 2 miles.
A spotlight on archery
Floyd is hopeful that lawmakers and the Education Department will be able to provide clarification on its interpretation of the law soon. The Education Department 鈥渨ill continue to offer technical assistance to help Congress address this statutory language issue,鈥� the agency spokesperson said.
The silver lining of the situation, Floyd said, is that awareness of school archery programs has grown.
As with any sport, archery provides students with the experience of confronting a challenge, learning new skills, and bonding with teammates, Floyd said. The majority of students participating in NASP鈥�66 percent鈥攁re first-time archers, and the program鈥檚 participation is split evenly between boys and girls.
鈥淲e鈥檝e chosen to look at this thing as an opportunity for so many people to come together,鈥� Floyd said. 鈥淲e鈥檝e encouraged our people to come together, to let their representatives, their elected officials, know how they feel about the benefits of archery for students.鈥�
