Louisiana is gearing up to open a new front in its push to expand educational choice, essentially creating a marketplace that lets students shop around for publicly funded courses鈥攂oth online and face-to-face鈥攂eyond their schoolhouse doors.
More than 30 providers already have stepped forward seeking state approval to take part in the program, which opens for business next school year.
Several national experts said the statewide program appears to be unique, even as it blends elements of some existing approaches, from virtual and charter schools to voucher programs.
Billed as offering 鈥渁 la carte school choice to Louisiana students and families, one course at a time鈥� by the state education department, the program was approved this year as part of a larger education package. Although it鈥檚 been largely overshadowed by a companion measure expanding private school vouchers, some observers suggest the ramifications of Course Choice are wider reaching.
鈥淭his actually could have far more impact on students, schools, districts, and postsecondary education,鈥� said Leslie R. Jacobs, a former state school board member and the founder of Educate Now!, an advocacy group in New Orleans. 鈥淚 think this is very innovative. ... The student makes the decision; the district has to pay for it.鈥�
Under the new program, public dollars鈥攊n the form of a slice of local districts鈥� combined state and local aid鈥攚ill cover course fees (with some limits) for any student attending a public school rated C, D, or F under the state accountability system. 69传媒 in an A or B school may be eligible if their school does not offer a course equivalent to one approved by the state.
Theoretically, students could earn most of their credits through alternative providers. Although the program is open throughout K-12, state officials and outside experts say they expect it will be most common at the high school level.
鈥淲e don鈥檛 know of anything else like it,鈥� David Lefkowith, a deputy superintendent at the Louisiana education department, said of the program. 鈥淲e鈥檙e an air-traffic controller. ... We鈥檙e just making sure everybody lands safely, and that it鈥檚 a quality ride. We are content and quality control, not curriculum development.鈥�
Organizations that have applied to join Louisiana鈥檚 new marketplace include many national online-learning companies, such as Sylvan Learning and Apex Learning, as well as some local entities, including the of the nonprofit Associated Builders and Contractors, Southern University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in Baton Rouge, and the state-run Louisiana Educational Television Authority.
Legal Challenge
The initiative, however, is getting mixed reviews. One complaint is the potential financial loss for districts. Also, some skeptics say quality control is a huge concern, and they question whether the state will successfully maintain it.
鈥淭here鈥檚 little question that, ultimately, education delivery in the United States is going to change in the face of technological innovations and possibilities out there,鈥� said Jeffrey Henig, a professor of political science and education at Teachers College, Columbia University. 鈥淏ut this sounds to me like a 鈥榡ump in with two feet and eyes half closed鈥� approach to it.鈥�
Student Eligibility
鈥� All Louisiana students in grades K-12 may participate, but may not qualify for public funding.
鈥� All students attending schools rated C, D, or F under the state accountability system are eligible for public funding.
鈥� 69传媒 attending A or B schools may be eligible for public funding if their school does not offer a course deemed equivalent to a Course Choice offering they wish to take.
Payments
鈥� 50 percent of state-approved tuition is paid when student starts course. Other half paid upon successful, on-time completion of course.
鈥� Maximum tuition for one course is 90 percent of one-sixth of an LEA鈥檚 per-pupil funding under the state鈥檚 minimum foundation program.
鈥� Home district will receive a minimum of 25 percent of per-pupil funding for each student.
Providers
鈥� Virtually any public or private entity that wins state approval may provide courses, including postsecondary institutions, private schools, school districts, virtual education providers, corporations or industry associations, and educational entrepreneurs (such as a teacher or group of teachers with a 鈥減roven track record of success鈥�).
Classes
鈥� Priority areas include core courses, college-credit courses, and career and technical education.
鈥� No limit on number of courses a student may take, but publicly funded students must enroll in at least one course in their home school.
Meanwhile, several Louisiana education groups, including the two teachers鈥� unions, have waged a legal challenge to Course Choice and other key provisions of the new school choice law. They argue that the state lacks the constitutional authority to redirect public funds intended for local districts. A hearing by a state district court is scheduled for next month.
鈥楤uilding Accountability In鈥�
The Course Choice program was established under legislation signed in April by Gov. Bobby Jindal, a Republican. The measure also expanded a private-school-voucher program in New Orleans to make it available statewide, with some restrictions, and established new pathways for the creation of charter schools.
The state has spelled out three particular areas for Course Choice classes over the first year: core academic courses, career and technical education, and courses that bear college credit. The types of courses proposed by applicants include math, science, fine arts, foreign languages, Advanced Placement courses, cosmetology, carpentry, and welding, among others.
Mr. Lefkowith said the state will move cautiously into this new sphere: 鈥淲e鈥檙e going to have a bias the first year to do a few things really well.鈥�
In scanning the nation for similar state programs, Mr. Lefkowith said the closest his agency could find was , created in 2011. While the funding mechanism is similar, Utah鈥檚 program is more limited in some respects. For instance, it offers only virtual courses, the only eligible providers are other public school districts, and it鈥檚 exclusively a high school program.
Chester E. Finn Jr., the president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, a Washington think tank, said Louisiana鈥檚 new program has echoes of the postsecondary realm.
鈥淚t鈥檚 analogous to something that鈥檚 been going on in higher education for a long time,鈥� he said, 鈥渢he ability to sort of pull together course credits from a variety of places and get them counted toward your diploma.鈥�
Added Mr. Finn, a longtime proponent of expanding school choice: 鈥淭his is a bold and promising and interesting experiment, but it鈥檚 full of pitfalls.鈥�
The challenges of ensuring course quality should not be underestimated, he said, including decisions on which courses and providers are approved, how they are monitored over time, and how to judge whether student work deserves credit.
鈥淭hese are not trivial issues,鈥� Mr. Finn said. 鈥淭he reason that doesn鈥檛 throw me into a total tizzy is it鈥檚 not as though we鈥檝e been doing a very good job of quality control in regular courses in regular schools. ... And in most cases, the arrangement is for kids who are in schools that are not doing a very good job.鈥�
Kevin G. Welner, an education professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder who has raised concerns about some choice initiatives, said that based on his review of materials about the new program, he sees reason for alarm.
鈥淭he approach taken in Louisiana is a very ... deregulated one that has a little bit of a veneer of accountability and vetting,鈥� he said, 鈥渂ut doesn鈥檛 seem to have many specifics that could provide assurance that the quality is really going to be there.鈥�
Mr. Henig from Teachers College said he wonders whether the state education agency has adequate capacity to effectively manage the program.
鈥淲hether the state can really provide any kind of serious data collection, analysis, oversight, and ability to intervene when there are bad actors,鈥� he said, 鈥渢hat is a huge leap of faith.鈥�
But Mr. Lefkowith insists that state officials are keenly aware of the need for a robust accountability system and are laying the groundwork for one.
鈥淏elieve me, we are building accountability in,鈥� Mr. Lefkowith said. He outlined what he described as six levels of such oversight, from a rigorous vetting process upfront of both the providers and the individual courses they wish to offer (including independent peer review) to regular monitoring and evaluation of programs over time.
Aid Follows Student
Vendors who apply may propose lots of courses, but he said the state may well only approve some of them.
Up to 75 percent of a district鈥檚 per-pupil state and local aid under Louisiana鈥檚 minimum foundation program could pay for courses. Mr. Lefkowith said that translates into roughly $5,000 to $8,000 per student, depending on the district.
鈥淭he challenge for districts will be, if one student leaves any one class, you can鈥檛 really change your staffing formula,鈥� said Ms. Jacobs of Educate Now!
But Ms. Jacobs believes the program could serve as a powerful incentive for districts to make their offerings more attractive.
鈥淥ver time, what this will do is create competition to provide good coursework to high school students,鈥� she said.
In fact, districts themselves, as well as private schools, are eligible to become providers of classes for students in other districts. Also, the program applies to students in public charter schools, who may enroll in Course Choice programs at public expense.
Steve Monaghan, the president of the Louisiana Federation of Teachers, an affiliate of the American Federation of Teachers, argues that the program will take a financial toll on already strapped districts. The group鈥檚 lawsuit focuses on what it calls the inappropriate diversion of public funds under the state鈥檚 minimum foundation program.
鈥淲e believe that the Louisiana Constitution clearly indicates what these dollars are appropriated to do,鈥� he said.
Mr. Monaghan also argues that the program is vulnerable to foul play. The LFT recently highlighted contributions made by the political action committee for the Pelican chapter of the Associated Builders and Contractors to some state lawmakers who backed the Course Choice legislation, as well as to members of the elected state school board.
Mr. Monaghan suggests that such financial contributions may jeopardize the state鈥檚 fairness in evaluating the group鈥檚 application.
鈥淎BC gets featured as the poster child .... in a [recent] press release鈥� from the state education department about Course Choice, he said.
Staying Competitive
The builders鈥� association is applying to provide a number of courses in such areas as carpentry, pipefitting, and welding.
鈥淚t鈥檚 about training young people to have a meaningful career in construction,鈥� said Alvin M. Bargas, the president of the Pelican chapter of the ABC.
On the issue of influence, Mr. Bargas said that his organization鈥檚 PAC has long supported political candidates, but that such aid was 鈥渄efinitely not intended鈥� to win favor for its application, nor does he expect any special treatment.
Mr. Lefkowith said no favoritism will be forthcoming, but that in any case, the ABC wrote what he called 鈥渁 terrific application.鈥�
He said: 鈥淭hey have course content ... that is gold standard. Quite frankly, the last thing we have to worry about is ABC scamming the system.鈥�
Richard D. Lavergne, the superintendent of the 8,500-student St. Martin Parish district, near Lafayette, said he sees value in providing more options for students, but worries about the financial toll of Course Choice on school systems.
鈥淚t could have a significant effect, especially if students take three or four courses,鈥� he said.
Mr. Lavergne said he wishes the state program had been designed so that course providers work 鈥渢hrough districts,鈥� not around them. That said, he鈥檚 determined to stay competitive. His district recently launched a virtual school, he said, and is expanding enrollment in a dual-credit program with a community college.
鈥淥bviously, it makes us think that we have to do things different,鈥� he said. 鈥淚鈥檓 trying to find ways to offer a greater variety of courses to keep students here.鈥�
