69传媒

Opinion
Law & Courts Opinion

It鈥檚 Time to Teach Our Ugly American History

By Joseph McGill 鈥 September 07, 2017 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print
Email Copy URL

The preservation of historic buildings is a method of showcasing a history in which we, the American people, take pride. What鈥檚 often missing in this story are the people from whom I and many others in our nation derived their DNA: the enslaved.

Since founding the Slave Dwelling Project in 2010, which helps to preserve surviving slave quarters, I have spent nights at nearly 100 slave dwellings in 19 states and the District of Columbia. The purpose of these sleepovers, which I lead for students, educators, and other individuals, is to bring much-needed attention to these buildings. Seeing and entering these physical structures makes it hard to deny the presence of the people who occupied them and provides a much-needed opportunity to learn about chattel slavery.

It's Time to Teach Our Ugly American History: Removing Confederate monuments won't solve our problems

I apply that same thinking to Confederate monuments. As an African-American, my position is rare. Last month鈥檚 violent white nationalist rally over the proposed removal of a statue of Robert E. Lee, in Charlottesville, Va., re-energized the movement to remove controversial statues, monuments, and plaques devoted to the Civil War. Mayors in Baltimore; Gainesville, Fla.; and other cities did just that. And, in some cases, such as in Durham, N.C., protesters pulled down statues themselves.

From the end of the Civil War through the civil rights movement, monuments and other symbols of the Confederacy were erected to commemorate a lost cause and the soldiers who fought for it. They were also used to intimidate African-American citizens.

Despite the controversy, I support leaving them in place.

Here鈥檚 why: They tell us a lot about an American history shaped by white supremacy. Just as in my work leading tours of slave dwellings, educating others about this history is our chance to change the narrative. But now that our nation has embarked on this slippery slope of sanitizing our past, where will it stop?

Our founding fathers created a system of slavery far more brutal than any before it. From the time the first enslaved person from Africa arrived unwillingly in Jamestown, Va., in 1619 to the Civil War鈥檚 end in 1865, chattel slavery (in which an enslaved individual鈥檚 descendants were also property) prospered. Chattel slavery was sanctioned by this nation鈥檚 religious institutions, universities, and lawmakers, which ensured its longevity. Forty-one signers of the Declaration of Independence were slave owners, as well as 12 U.S. presidents鈥攅ight of them while in office.

All states now have the opportunity to examine the uglier side of all that we hold dear.

Even after the Revolutionary War, when Northern states began to abolish slavery, the residents of these states still reaped its benefits and condoned its existence. Their complicity was in owning the banks, insurance companies, and factories that profited from the cotton picked by the enslaved. Even institutions of higher learning have roots in slavery. Georgetown University, for example, formally apologized earlier this year for its involvement in selling 272 slaves in the 1800s to pay off debts.

Erasing history has always been a part of how Americans have dealt with the atrocities of the past. There aren鈥檛 many buildings or statues that denote lynching, the genocide of Native Americans, World War II鈥檚 Japanese internment camps, and other horrific actions because we are not proud of them. Some proponents of monument removal would argue that the violent roots of the Confederacy justify why its commemorations should disappear. But I would argue that removal doesn鈥檛 solve our problems.

In fact, scrubbing all visible traces of white supremacy from the landscape is nearly impossible and would mean we鈥檇 have few historical markers left. A 2016 report from scattered across the country. That number does not include the schools or national holidays that honor the Confederacy in some way. New Orleans, for example, took down four Confederate monuments in April but left in place the statue of Andrew Jackson, the person responsible for the Trail of Tears鈥攖he forced removal of Native Americans under the Indian Removal Act of 1830.

Representations of the past, from the Jefferson Memorial to the Washington Monument, should instead focus on educating future generations about this country鈥檚 complicated history. We need to change the narrative of our nation. Removing monuments won鈥檛 do that. We must tell our students the good, the bad, and the ugly of our past. And in the case of those who fought for the Confederacy, we shouldn鈥檛 hide the numbers of slaves they owned or the uniforms that they wore.

All states now have the opportunity to examine the uglier side of all that we hold dear. If we鈥檙e going all the way, let鈥檚 rid ourselves of the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Ala. Let鈥檚 stop singing the National Anthem鈥檚 racist third verse. Let鈥檚 take the 鈥淣鈥 word out of Huckleberry Finn. And anything memorializing the slave-owning white supremacists who signed the Declaration of Independence, including Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson, must go.

If the unfortunate incidents of Charlottesville, Va., are any indication, future generations will soon side with those who believe that all these monuments should be removed from public places. Instead of erasing history, why don鈥檛 we educate our students about it honestly?

A version of this article appeared in the September 13, 2017 edition of Education Week as We Must Teach Our Ugly Past, Not Erase It

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Special Education Webinar
Don鈥檛 Count Them Out: Dyscalculia Support from PreK-Career
Join Dr. Elliott and Dr. Wall as they empower educators to support students with dyscalculia to envision successful careers and leadership roles.
Content provided by 
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being Webinar
Improve School Culture and Engage 69传媒: Archery鈥檚 Critical Role in Education
Changing lives one arrow at a time. Find out why administrators and principals are raving about archery in their schools.
Content provided by 
School Climate & Safety Webinar Engaging Every Student: How to Address Absenteeism and Build Belonging
Gain valuable insights and practical solutions to address absenteeism and build a more welcoming and supportive school environment.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide 鈥 elementary, middle, high school and more.
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.

Read Next

Law & Courts Are Religious Charter 69传媒 Legal? The Supreme Court Will Decide Soon
The court's ruling could fundamentally alter the line between church and state in education.
5 min read
The Supreme Court in Washington, June 30, 2024.
The U.S. Supreme Court has granted review in a potentially landmark case about whether a state may, or even must, include a religious school in its public charter school funding program.
Susan Walsh/AP
Law & Courts Legal Fights Highlight Clashes Over Transgender 69传媒鈥 Pronouns in 69传媒
A federal court weighs the case of a teacher who refused to use students' chosen names and pronouns, as similar questions arise elsewhere.
9 min read
John Kluge, a former Indiana teacher, pictured in an undated photo.
John M. Kluge is an Indiana teacher who was dismissed for refusing to use transgender students' chosen names and pronouns.
Courtesy of Alliance Defending Freedom
Law & Courts Can Parents Opt Kids Out of 69传媒 LGBTQ+ Books? The Supreme Court Will Decide
The U.S. Supreme Court will take up a school district's policy of refusing to let parents opt out their children from LGBTQ+ storybooks.
3 min read
The Supreme Court on Wednesday afternoon, April 19, 2023, in Washington.
A view of the Supreme Court in the afternoon on April 19, 2023, in Washington.
Jacquelyn Martin/AP
Law & Courts How Educators Feel About the Supreme Court's Decision to Uphold TikTok Ban
The Supreme Court upheld a law targeting TikTok, increasing the uncertainty for an app highly popular among U.S. educators and students.
6 min read
Sarah Baus, left, of Charleston, S.C., and Tiffany Cianci, who says she is a "long-form educational content creator," livestream to TikTok outside the Supreme Court, on Jan. 10, 2025, in Washington.
Sarah Baus, left, of Charleston, S.C., and Tiffany Cianci, who says she is a "long-form educational content creator," livestream to TikTok outside the Supreme Court, on Jan. 10, 2025, in Washington.
Jacquelyn Martin/AP