69´«Ã½

School Choice & Charters

Public 69´«Ã½ Fare Well Against Private 69´«Ã½ in Study

By Mary Ann Zehr — July 25, 2006 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print
Email Copy URL

A new federal study comparing public and private schools reflects findings similar to those of two education researchers earlier this year: When certain scores on the National Assessment of Educational Progress are adjusted for socioeconomics, race, and other characteristics, public school students do as well as or better than private school students in some areas.

The study by the National Center for Education Statistics, released this month, represents the first time the U.S. Department of Education has applied techniques for controlling student-background variables to NAEP test data in a comparison of private and public schools, said Grover J. “Russ†Whitehurst, the director of the department’s Institute of Education Sciences.

Read posted by the .

He noted that an NCES study released in December made across-the-board comparisons of the NAEP scores of students at private and public schools. That study, “Student Achievement in Private 69´«Ã½: Results From NAEP 2000-2005,†found that students in grades 4, 8, and 12 at private schools had higher average scores in reading, mathematics, science, and writing than their public school counterparts.

But the scores of public and private school students look much different when researchers control for student and school characteristics, according to the new NCES study, “Comparing Private 69´«Ã½ and Public 69´«Ã½ Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling,†which looked at NAEP scores in reading and math for 4th and 8th graders. It found that public school students in those grades and subjects perform as well as or better than students at private schools, with the exception of 8th grade reading, where private school children do better than their public school peers.

The results are similar to those found by Christopher Lubienski and Sarah Theule Lubienski, researchers at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, in a study released in January. They looked only at NAEP math scores and controlled for factors such as socioeconomics and race. (“NAEP Analysis Questions Private 69´«Ã½â€™ Edge,†Feb. 1, 2006.)

Methodology Questioned

But Paul Peterson, a professor of government at Harvard University, doesn’t believe that either study has produced credible results. His criticism is that both the Lubienskis and the NCES relied on reporting by school administrators to control for student and school characteristics.

The problem, he said in an interview last week, is that administrators at public and private schools classify students very differently. “Public schools must by law classify people according to whether they are English-language learners, need an individualized education program, are eligible for a free lunch, and whether they are disadvantaged under Title I†of the No Child Left Behind Act, he said. “Private school managers have no legal obligation to do any of that, and many object to that,†he said, so the students may not in fact be labeled the same way, thus skewing any comparison.

Mr. Peterson said the Lubienski study spurred him to conduct a study of his own in which he compares the performance of private and public school students on NAEP while adjusting for certain student characteristics, such as socioeconomic status. But instead of relying primarily on data reported by school administrators, he uses statistics reported by students.

Mr. Peterson said he doesn’t yet have results to report, but plans to release them in September.

Meanwhile, the new NCES study has attracted wide interest and comment.

Articles published by The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal after its July 14 release quoted representatives of teachers’ unions who cited its findings and assessment of public schools to buttress their argument that public dollars shouldn’t be used to pay for private school vouchers. Then on July 18, Times columnist John Tierney accused union leaders of being “unrivaled masters of spin†in what he contended was their treatment of the report as “a public-school triumph.â€

Mr. Whitehurst said that from the federal government’s perspective, the NCES report “was viewed as a technical analysis rather than something that would generate as much attention as it has.â€

He added that the report would be useful for researchers, but would have little value for parents.

“Parents are not making a choice between the average public and private school,†he said. “They are making a choice about the school their children are attending and the other possible schools their children might attend.â€

A version of this article appeared in the July 26, 2006 edition of Education Week as Public 69´«Ã½ Fare Well Against Private 69´«Ã½ in Study

Events

School & District Management Webinar Crafting Outcomes-Based Contracts That Work for Everyone
Discover the power of outcomes-based contracts and how they can drive student achievement.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Harnessing AI to Address Chronic Absenteeism in 69´«Ã½
Learn how AI can help your district improve student attendance and boost academic outcomes.
Content provided by 
School & District Management Webinar EdMarketer Quick Hit: What’s Trending among K-12 Leaders?
What issues are keeping K-12 leaders up at night? Join us for EdMarketer Quick Hit: What’s Trending among K-12 Leaders?

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.

Read Next

School Choice & Charters Voters Rejected Private School Choice. A Trump Administration May Push It Anyway
Pro-school choice initiatives failed in Colorado, Kentucky, and Nebraska.
6 min read
Photo illustration of school building and check boxes.
Education Week + Getty
School Choice & Charters Charter 69´«Ã½ Are in Uncharted Political Waters This Election Season
From big constitutional questions to more practical, local concerns, the charter school sector faces a number of challenges.
6 min read
Illustration of a montage of election and politics imagery with a school building and money symbol included.
iStock/Getty
School Choice & Charters Private School Choice: What the Research Says
Private school choice programs are proliferating as debates continue about their effects on low-income students and public schools.
7 min read
Image of research, data, and a data dashboard
Collage via iStock/Getty
School Choice & Charters States Are Spending Billions on Private School Choice. But Is It Truly Universal?
More than half a million students in eight states last school year took advantage of private school choice open to all students.
7 min read
data 1454372869
filo/DigitalVision Vectors