69传媒

Federal

Senate Panel OKs Small Spending Increase

By Michelle R. Davis 鈥 July 26, 2005 5 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print
Email Copy URL

The two largest federal programs for K-12 education would see an end to the significant increases they have received in recent years, under a spending bill approved by the Senate Appropriations Committee for the 2006 fiscal year.

The committee on July 14 approved $56.7 billion in discretionary spending for the Department of Education for the budget year that begins Oct. 1. The bill, approved 27-0, would provide the department with an increase of $143 million, or just 0.25 percent, over the current year.

While the Senate committee鈥檚 bill would restore funding for a host of programs President Bush proposed for elimination in his budget proposal, both the Title I program for disadvantaged students and funding for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act would see only modest increases of $100 million each, less than a 1 percent increase per program.

鈥淲hen I talk about discretionary spending, I talk about a concept of the past,鈥 said Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., the chairman of the Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies. 鈥淭oday, all we look at is how far from the bone we are.鈥

The Senate committee also largely rejected the wishes of President Bush, who proposed in his budget to eliminate funding for 48 programs and add funding for certain new initiatives.

The committee鈥檚 proposed increase to $12.8 billion for Title I would be the smallest in eight years. The increase to $10.7 billion for special education would mark the first time in a decade that the federal share of spending for special education would drop, going from 18.6 percent of the excess costs of educating students with disabilities this year to 18 percent in 2006. Funding for those items鈥$13.3 billion for Title I and $12.1 billion for the IDEA鈥攁lso would come in well below the amounts proposed by the president.

Technology Aid Survives

鈥淔or the first time in 10 years, the federal government will slide backward on its commitment to students with disabilities,鈥 said Sen. Tom Harkin of Iowa, the ranking Democrat on the education appropriations subcommittee. 鈥淚鈥檓 very concerned once again that many schools around the country 鈥 will lose Title I funding in FY 2006 at the very time that the No Child Left Behind Act is holding them to higher and higher standards.鈥

But holding a strict line on K-12 education鈥檚 largest programs gave Senate appropriators room to add spending elsewhere.

The bill making its way through the Senate would provide $1.3 billion for vocational and technical education, essentially keeping funding levels the same as this year鈥檚 appropriation. The Senate bill would also finance a handful of other programs proposed for scrapping in Mr. Bush鈥檚 budget, including:

  • $306.5 million for GEAR UP and $837 million for TRIO, both programs to help students from disadvantaged families pursue higher education;
  • $35.7 million for arts in education; and
  • $11 million for the Javits Gifted and Talented Education program.
  • The programs would be funded at similar levels as this year.

    The Appropriations Committee鈥檚 bill would also provide $425 million to the Enhancing Education Through Technology program, which helps boost students鈥 and teachers鈥 technology skills.

    That amount, or the $300 million proposed by the House, which passed its education appropriations bill on June 24, would save the program Mr. Bush wants to eliminate, following a 27 percent cut to the program in 2005. Those setbacks shocked into action a coalition of education groups that lobbied for school technology for many years, but let its guard down in 2004.

    鈥淲e learned not to assume victory until you have it,鈥 said Don Knezek, the executive director of the International Society for Technology in Education, in Eugene, Ore.

    Mary Kusler, a senior legislative specialist for the American Association of School Administrators, said that while she was pleased the Senate proposal would restore funding for some programs 鈥渢he spreading-out of money essentially ends up hurting programs rather than helping,鈥 she said.

    鈥淭he federal formula programs benefit all districts, and yet those are the ones being cut or receiving dismal increases,鈥 she said.

    Some programs would take a significant hit under the Senate committee鈥檚 bill, including the Safe and Drug-Free 69传媒 and Communities program, which would face a cut of $137 million, or 31 percent, from this year鈥檚 appropriation of $437 million.

    The Senate Appropriations Committee, like its counterpart in the House, also ignored President Bush鈥檚 request for $1.2 billion in new money for his high school initiative, which would bolster teacher training and learning plans for incoming 9th graders, among other goals, and $250 million for expanded high school testing. Unlike the House, which proposes $100 million for the president鈥檚 Teacher Incentive Fund, the Senate bill does not provide any money for it.

    69传媒 First

    The president got only a slight nod from the Senate committee when it came to reading. Mr. Bush had requested $200 million for his Striving Readers program. The House would provide $30 million, while the Senate bill would provide $35 million.

    Money for 69传媒 First鈥攖he main federal initiative in the subject鈥攚ould stay flat under both the House and the Senate proposals, at just over $1 billion.

    The Senate bill includes language addressing persistent complaints that the 69传媒 First program has gone too far in restricting the selection of reading materials for participating schools. The Baltimore-based Success for All Foundation, for example, filed a complaint with the Education Department鈥檚 inspector general, citing pressure some schools said they felt to discontinue the curriculum in order to win 69传媒 First funds. (鈥淐omplaint Filed Against 69传媒 Initiative,鈥 June 22, 2005.)

    The bill directs the Education Department to provide clear guidance to 69传媒 First Technical Assistance Centers and to states that there is no 鈥渁pproved鈥 list of programs for grant recipients, and that decisions on reading materials are to be made at the school level, subject to state approval.

    Associate Editor Kathleen Kennedy Manzo and Staff Writer Andrew Trotter contributed to this report.

    Events

    This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
    Sponsor
    Special Education Webinar
    Don鈥檛 Count Them Out: Dyscalculia Support from PreK-Career
    Join Dr. Elliott and Dr. Wall as they empower educators to support students with dyscalculia to envision successful careers and leadership roles.
    Content provided by 
    This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
    Sponsor
    Student Well-Being Webinar
    Improve School Culture and Engage 69传媒: Archery鈥檚 Critical Role in Education
    Changing lives one arrow at a time. Find out why administrators and principals are raving about archery in their schools.
    Content provided by 
    School Climate & Safety Webinar Engaging Every Student: How to Address Absenteeism and Build Belonging
    Gain valuable insights and practical solutions to address absenteeism and build a more welcoming and supportive school environment.

    EdWeek Top School Jobs

    Teacher Jobs
    Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide 鈥 elementary, middle, high school and more.
    Principal Jobs
    Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
    Administrator Jobs
    Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
    Support Staff Jobs
    Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.

    Read Next

    Federal Title IX, School Choice, 鈥業ndoctrination鈥欌擧ow Trump Took on 69传媒 in Week 2
    It was a week in which the newly inaugurated president began wholeheartedly to act on his agenda for schools.
    8 min read
    Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump arrives at an election night watch party at the Palm Beach Convention Center on Nov. 6, 2024, in West Palm Beach, Fla.
    Donald Trump arrives at an election night watch party at the Palm Beach Convention Center on Nov. 6, 2024, in West Palm Beach, Fla. Trump's second week in the White House featured his first direct foray into policymaking aimed directly at schools.
    Evan Vucci/AP
    Federal Then & Now Why Can't We Leave No Child Left Behind ... Behind?
    The law and its contours are stuck in our collective memory. What does that say about how we understand K-12 policy?
    6 min read
    Collage image of former President G.W. Bush signing NCLB bill.
    Liz Yap/Education Week and Canva
    Federal What's in Trump's New Executive Orders on Indoctrination and School Choice
    The White House has no authority over curriculum, and no ability to unilaterally pull back federal dollars, but Trump is toeing the line.
    9 min read
    President Donald Trump signs a document in the Oval Office at the White House, Thursday, Jan. 30, 2025, in Washington.
    President Donald Trump signs a document in the Oval Office at the White House, Thursday, Jan. 30, 2025, in Washington.
    Evan Vucci/AP
    Federal Trump Threatens School Funding Cuts in Effort to End 'Radical Indoctrination'
    An executive order from the president marks an effort from the White House to influence what schools teach.
    6 min read
    President Donald Trump, right, arrives in a classroom at St. Andrew Catholic School in Orlando, Fla., on March 3, 2017.
    President Donald Trump visits a classroom at St. Andrew Catholic School in Orlando, Fla., on March 3, 2017. Trump issued an executive order on Jan. 29, 2025, that aims to end what he calls "radical indoctrination" in the nation's schools.
    Joe Burbank/Orlando Sentinel via AP