69传媒

Federal

Senate Panel OKs Small Spending Increase

By Michelle R. Davis 鈥 July 26, 2005 5 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print
Email Copy URL

The two largest federal programs for K-12 education would see an end to the significant increases they have received in recent years, under a spending bill approved by the Senate Appropriations Committee for the 2006 fiscal year.

The committee on July 14 approved $56.7 billion in discretionary spending for the Department of Education for the budget year that begins Oct. 1. The bill, approved 27-0, would provide the department with an increase of $143 million, or just 0.25 percent, over the current year.

While the Senate committee鈥檚 bill would restore funding for a host of programs President Bush proposed for elimination in his budget proposal, both the Title I program for disadvantaged students and funding for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act would see only modest increases of $100 million each, less than a 1 percent increase per program.

鈥淲hen I talk about discretionary spending, I talk about a concept of the past,鈥 said Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., the chairman of the Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies. 鈥淭oday, all we look at is how far from the bone we are.鈥

The Senate committee also largely rejected the wishes of President Bush, who proposed in his budget to eliminate funding for 48 programs and add funding for certain new initiatives.

The committee鈥檚 proposed increase to $12.8 billion for Title I would be the smallest in eight years. The increase to $10.7 billion for special education would mark the first time in a decade that the federal share of spending for special education would drop, going from 18.6 percent of the excess costs of educating students with disabilities this year to 18 percent in 2006. Funding for those items鈥$13.3 billion for Title I and $12.1 billion for the IDEA鈥攁lso would come in well below the amounts proposed by the president.

Technology Aid Survives

鈥淔or the first time in 10 years, the federal government will slide backward on its commitment to students with disabilities,鈥 said Sen. Tom Harkin of Iowa, the ranking Democrat on the education appropriations subcommittee. 鈥淚鈥檓 very concerned once again that many schools around the country 鈥 will lose Title I funding in FY 2006 at the very time that the No Child Left Behind Act is holding them to higher and higher standards.鈥

But holding a strict line on K-12 education鈥檚 largest programs gave Senate appropriators room to add spending elsewhere.

The bill making its way through the Senate would provide $1.3 billion for vocational and technical education, essentially keeping funding levels the same as this year鈥檚 appropriation. The Senate bill would also finance a handful of other programs proposed for scrapping in Mr. Bush鈥檚 budget, including:

  • $306.5 million for GEAR UP and $837 million for TRIO, both programs to help students from disadvantaged families pursue higher education;
  • $35.7 million for arts in education; and
  • $11 million for the Javits Gifted and Talented Education program.
  • The programs would be funded at similar levels as this year.

    The Appropriations Committee鈥檚 bill would also provide $425 million to the Enhancing Education Through Technology program, which helps boost students鈥 and teachers鈥 technology skills.

    That amount, or the $300 million proposed by the House, which passed its education appropriations bill on June 24, would save the program Mr. Bush wants to eliminate, following a 27 percent cut to the program in 2005. Those setbacks shocked into action a coalition of education groups that lobbied for school technology for many years, but let its guard down in 2004.

    鈥淲e learned not to assume victory until you have it,鈥 said Don Knezek, the executive director of the International Society for Technology in Education, in Eugene, Ore.

    Mary Kusler, a senior legislative specialist for the American Association of School Administrators, said that while she was pleased the Senate proposal would restore funding for some programs 鈥渢he spreading-out of money essentially ends up hurting programs rather than helping,鈥 she said.

    鈥淭he federal formula programs benefit all districts, and yet those are the ones being cut or receiving dismal increases,鈥 she said.

    Some programs would take a significant hit under the Senate committee鈥檚 bill, including the Safe and Drug-Free 69传媒 and Communities program, which would face a cut of $137 million, or 31 percent, from this year鈥檚 appropriation of $437 million.

    The Senate Appropriations Committee, like its counterpart in the House, also ignored President Bush鈥檚 request for $1.2 billion in new money for his high school initiative, which would bolster teacher training and learning plans for incoming 9th graders, among other goals, and $250 million for expanded high school testing. Unlike the House, which proposes $100 million for the president鈥檚 Teacher Incentive Fund, the Senate bill does not provide any money for it.

    69传媒 First

    The president got only a slight nod from the Senate committee when it came to reading. Mr. Bush had requested $200 million for his Striving Readers program. The House would provide $30 million, while the Senate bill would provide $35 million.

    Money for 69传媒 First鈥攖he main federal initiative in the subject鈥攚ould stay flat under both the House and the Senate proposals, at just over $1 billion.

    The Senate bill includes language addressing persistent complaints that the 69传媒 First program has gone too far in restricting the selection of reading materials for participating schools. The Baltimore-based Success for All Foundation, for example, filed a complaint with the Education Department鈥檚 inspector general, citing pressure some schools said they felt to discontinue the curriculum in order to win 69传媒 First funds. (鈥淐omplaint Filed Against 69传媒 Initiative,鈥 June 22, 2005.)

    The bill directs the Education Department to provide clear guidance to 69传媒 First Technical Assistance Centers and to states that there is no 鈥渁pproved鈥 list of programs for grant recipients, and that decisions on reading materials are to be made at the school level, subject to state approval.

    Associate Editor Kathleen Kennedy Manzo and Staff Writer Andrew Trotter contributed to this report.

    Events

    This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
    Sponsor
    Artificial Intelligence Webinar
    AI and Educational Leadership: Driving Innovation and Equity
    Discover how to leverage AI to transform teaching, leadership, and administration. Network with experts and learn practical strategies.
    Content provided by 
    This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
    Sponsor
    School Climate & Safety Webinar
    Investing in Success: Leading a Culture of Safety and Support
    Content provided by 
    Assessment K-12 Essentials Forum Making Competency-Based Learning a Reality
    Join this free virtual event to hear from educators and experts working to implement competency-based education.

    EdWeek Top School Jobs

    Teacher Jobs
    Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide 鈥 elementary, middle, high school and more.
    Principal Jobs
    Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
    Administrator Jobs
    Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
    Support Staff Jobs
    Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.

    Read Next

    Federal Opinion What's Really at Stake for Education in This Election?
    What a Harris or Trump presidential victory might mean for federal education policy, according to Rick Hess.
    5 min read
    The United States Capitol building as a bookcase filled with red, white, and blue policy books in a Washington DC landscape.
    Luca D'Urbino for Education Week
    Federal Trump's K-12 Record in His First Term Offers a Blueprint for What Could Be Next
    In his first term, Trump sought to significantly expand school choice, slash K-12 spending, and tear down the U.S. Department of Education.
    11 min read
    Education Secretary Betsy DeVos listens at left as President Donald Trump speaks during a round table discussion at Saint Andrew Catholic School on March 3, 2017, in Orlando, Fla.
    Education Secretary Betsy DeVos listens at left as President Donald Trump speaks during a round table discussion at Saint Andrew Catholic School on March 3, 2017, in Orlando, Fla. The education policies Trump pursued in his first term offer clues for what a second Trump term would look like for K-12 schools.
    Alex Brandon/AP
    Federal From Our Research Center How Educators Say They'll Vote in the 2024 Election
    Educators' feelings on Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump vary by age and the communities where they work.
    4 min read
    Jacob Lewis, 3, waits at a privacy booth as his grandfather, Robert Schroyer, fills out his ballot while voting at Sabillasville Elementary School, Nov. 8, 2022, in Sabillasville, Md.
    Jacob Lewis, 3, waits at a privacy booth as his grandfather, Robert Schroyer, fills out his ballot while voting at Sabillasville Elementary School, Nov. 8, 2022, in Sabillasville, Md.
    Julio Cortez/AP
    Federal Q&A Oklahoma State Chief Ryan Walters: 'Trump's Won the Argument on Education'
    The state schools chief's name comes up as Republicans discuss who could become education secretary in a second Trump administration.
    8 min read
    Ryan Walters, then-Republican candidate for Oklahoma State Superintendent, speaks at a rally, Nov. 1, 2022, in Oklahoma City.
    Ryan Walters speaks at a rally on Nov. 1, 2022, in Oklahoma City as a candidate for state superintendent of public instruction. He won the race and has built a national profile for governing in the MAGA mold.
    Sue Ogrocki/AP