A new congressional report suggests that at least one former 69传媒 First consultant actively pushed his own commercial products while serving as a key adviser to states on applying for the reading grants, contrary to his testimony last month at a federal hearing.
The report released today by the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee includes financial statements of that consultant, Edward J. Kame鈥檈nui, and his counterparts at the U.S. Department of Education鈥檚 regional technical-assistance centers, as well as the details of some contracts between the consultants and commercial publishers.
鈥淭he committee鈥檚 investigation revealed that four [technical-assistance-center directors] had substantial financial ties with various education publishers during the time they were under contract or subcontract with the department for the 69传媒 First program,鈥� said the report, released by Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., the chairman of the education committee.
Last month, Sen. Kennedy issued formal requests for documents from a number of 69传媒 First contractors, including those who served as directors of three regional technical-assistance centers that provided advice to states on meeting the grant program鈥檚 strict guidelines.
The report details the financial ties of the former directors of those centers: Douglas Carnine and Mr. Kame鈥檈nui from the University of Oregon; Joseph Torgesen at Florida State University; and Sharon Vaughn at the University of Texas at Austin.
Mr. Kame鈥檈nui is currently on leave from his university while he serves as the commissioner for the National Center for Special Education Research at the Department of Education. He testified at a contentious hearing before the House education committee last month that there were no 鈥渞eal conflicts of interest鈥� among him and his colleagues who served as advisers on 69传媒 First. He also said that he never promoted the products he had written.
Yet the Senate report highlights e-mail exchanges among Mr. Kame鈥檈nui and a representative of Pearson Scott Foresman, which publishes his reading intervention program, that suggest they collaborated to influence a top Education Department official鈥檚 view of the text. After a meeting between the official and the publisher, Mr. Kame鈥檈nui wrote that 鈥淧earson is in a favorable position to exact influence鈥� with the official.
The meeting in June 2002 was during the grant-review process for 69传媒 First.
鈥淒r. Kame鈥檈nui acted and lobbied on behalf of Scott Foresman, from whom he was receiving compensation, while he was the team leader of the 69传媒 First assessment committee and as director of the 69传媒 First Western Technical Assistance Center,鈥� the Senate report says. 鈥淭hroughout his tenure as director, 鈥� Dr. Kame鈥檈nui continued to attend and present at various reading conferences and meetings on Scott Foresman鈥檚 behalf,鈥� it says.
The Early Intervention 69传媒 program that he co-wrote with Deborah C. Simmons, a former education professor at the University of Oregon, is widely used in 69传媒 First schools.
鈥楢lways Forthcoming鈥�
The inspector general of the Education Department concluded in February in the final of six reports on 69传媒 First that the program鈥檚 primary contractor, RMC Research Corp., did not properly screen its subcontractors for conflicts of interest. The Portsmouth, N.H.-based research company managed the technical-assistance centers under a $37 million federal contract.
鈥淚 find it very disappointing to think that these activities were going on for four years and no one at the Department of Education took the time to follow through not only with publisher complaints, but with complaints from school systems,鈥� said Cindy Cupp, the publisher of a reading program who registered complaints that led to inquiries by the inspector general and the Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress.
Those reviews generally supported her claims that federal officials charged with implementing the $1 billion-a-year 69传媒 First program favored certain commercial programs and worked to prohibit the use of others. The No Child Left Behind Act, which authorized the reading initiative, prohibits federal officials from directing states toward specific curricula, assessments, or instructional approaches. Ms. Vaughn said in an interview that her outside ventures were vetted by the University of Texas for conflicts of interest.
鈥淚 have always been forthcoming about my outside sources of income, and at no time was I influenced by any financial relationships with publishers, nor were these relationships relevant to 69传媒 First during my tenure as director鈥� of the regional technical-assistance center, she said.
Mr. Carnine, the author of college textbooks and middle and high school instructional programs in several subjects, said he does not receive any royalties from publishers of K-3 reading programs. Mr. Torgesen did not respond to a request for comment. The Education Department did not respond to a request for an interview with Mr. Kame鈥檈nui.
