69传媒

Federal

States Seeking Greater Rural Flexibility Under NCLB

By Jessica L. Tonn 鈥 April 03, 2007 5 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print
Email Copy URL

The No Child Left Behind Act hampers states鈥 ability to help thousands of small and rural school districts, imposing constraints that federal lawmakers should consider lifting as they discuss the law鈥檚 reauthorization, educators from predominantly rural states said at a meeting here last week.

鈥淭he federal government should supplement and support rather than dictate state efforts in education,鈥 says a legislative agenda put forward by the National Rural Education Advocacy Coalition, an umbrella organization that includes the National Rural Education Association, the American Association of School Administrators, and state-level rural education groups.

Jimmy Cunningham, left, the superintendent of the Danville, Ark., schools, listens to National School Boards Association lobbyist Reginald M. Felton at the National Rural Education Association's legislative forum on March 26.

The statement outlining the coalition鈥檚 2007 legislative priorities urges that federal efforts 鈥渇ocus on program improvement for schools and districts that need assistance rather than on one-size-fits-all sanctions that do not meet the unique needs and challenges of rural schools.鈥

Scott R. Palmer, a lawyer with the Washington-based law firm of Holland & Knight and a consultant for the Council of Chief State School Officers, said the concern extends beyond traditional farm states and districts.

鈥淭his is an issue for all state chiefs because almost every state has small and rural schools,鈥 Mr. Palmer said in an interview.

Compliance Challenge

Rural educators also say that the isolation of most rural schools can make it difficult, if not impossible, to comply with the law鈥檚 consequences for failing schools, which can include the offer of public school choice and tutoring.

For example, Wyoming, which has 48 districts and 362 schools spread out over nearly 98,000 square miles, has three supplemental-educational-service providers approved by the state, according to a March 2 letter from the state鈥檚 superintendent of public instruction, Jim McBride, to U.S. Sen. Michael B. Enzi, a Wyoming Republican who is an outspoken proponent of altering the NCLB law to help rural schools.

From left, Seth Adams, Scott Turney, and Claudette Morton, members of the National Rural Education Association, listen at the group's legislative forum in Arlington, Va.

But 鈥渘one of these [service providers] have shown real promise in addressing the needs of our struggling districts,鈥 the letter says. 鈥淭he solution 鈥 will likely come from aggressive staff-development activities, community support, and technical-assistance visits from my staff.鈥

Increased responsibilities for state education department staff members under the 5-year-old law are especially a burden for states like Wyoming, which is large in area but has a small education department, Mr. Palmer said.

鈥淲hat do you do in a state where you can look around the room and see everyone in the education department?鈥 he said.

Mr. Palmer and others note that small populations in rural communities and states also make for small student-testing pools, which can make it hard to judge with certainty whether or not schools are meeting achievement targets, or adequate yearly progress.

鈥淚n small schools (and districts), even the overall number of test scores is often far below the minimum number for AYP accountability,鈥 says a 2003 report that Mr. Palmer wrote for the CCSSO. 鈥淚ndeed, in some states, the majority of schools fall into this category.

The rural educators are urging lawmakers to modify the AYP requirements to reflect the needs of small schools and districts.

Teacher Requirements

Among the other challenges, rural educators say, is finding enough teachers rated as 鈥渉ighly qualified鈥 under the federal law to staff schools in isolated communities.

Under the law, all teachers of core subjects are supposed to be highly qualified, meaning they hold a standard state teaching license and have demonstrated knowledge of the subjects they teach. Certain rural schools are exempt from the requirement, although some educators argue that the federal government鈥檚 definition of 鈥渞ural,鈥 based on population density and district size, is too narrow.

Rural administrators contend that limited budgets often prevent small schools from hiring separate teachers for each class and, therefore, teachers often teach multiple subjects, such as biology, chemistry, and physics. The federal government should not set specific teacher standards, the NREAC statement says, because 鈥渟tates are more aware of the unique circumstances that face multiple-subject and other types of teachers in rural America.鈥

Other changes rural administrators would like to see in the NCLB law include: reducing the minimum number of students required for subgroup reporting; adopting 鈥済rowth models鈥 to measure student progress; judging schools solely on the performance of students supported by federal money; and exempting from federal scrutiny special education students and English-language learners. In particular, the number of English-learners in rural areas has increased dramatically since implementation of the law began after its signing by President Bush in 2002.

鈥淭he key to our 鈥 state鈥檚 success will be the allowance for maximum financial and academic flexibility,鈥 Mr. McBride鈥檚 letter says, echoing the sentiments of many other educators in predominantly rural states.

Regardless of increased flexibility, however, success will be difficult for small schools unless the law is fully funded, rural educators say, especially the section that provides money for schools based on their enrollment of students from low-income families. In particular, they emphasize the importance of Title I, the federal government鈥檚 primary program for aiding disadvantaged K-12 students.

鈥淭itle I is so critical to rural schools,鈥 Joseph Bard, the executive director of the Pennsylvania Association of Rural and Small 69传媒 and the chairman of the NREAC, said at last week鈥檚 meeting.

Unfortunately, Mr. Bard and others argue, the formula to allocate Title I money tends to target concentrations of low-income families, rather than percentages of poverty in districts. As a result, they say, larger, urbanized districts receive more money per pupil than do the smallest rural districts even though studies have shown that 35 percent of rural students live in poverty.

鈥淚f 30 percent of our kids go to rural schools, we鈥檙e talking about a lot of poor kids,鈥 said Mr. Bard. 鈥淭hose kids are being left behind.鈥

A version of this article appeared in the April 04, 2007 edition of Education Week as States Seeking Greater Rural Flexibility Under NCLB

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Artificial Intelligence Webinar
AI and Educational Leadership: Driving Innovation and Equity
Discover how to leverage AI to transform teaching, leadership, and administration. Network with experts and learn practical strategies.
Content provided by 
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School Climate & Safety Webinar
Investing in Success: Leading a Culture of Safety and Support
Content provided by 
Assessment K-12 Essentials Forum Making Competency-Based Learning a Reality
Join this free virtual event to hear from educators and experts working to implement competency-based education.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide 鈥 elementary, middle, high school and more.
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.

Read Next

Federal Opinion What's Really at Stake for Education in This Election?
What a Harris or Trump presidential victory might mean for federal education policy, according to Rick Hess.
5 min read
The United States Capitol building as a bookcase filled with red, white, and blue policy books in a Washington DC landscape.
Luca D'Urbino for Education Week
Federal Trump's K-12 Record in His First Term Offers a Blueprint for What Could Be Next
In his first term, Trump sought to significantly expand school choice, slash K-12 spending, and tear down the U.S. Department of Education.
11 min read
Education Secretary Betsy DeVos listens at left as President Donald Trump speaks during a round table discussion at Saint Andrew Catholic School on March 3, 2017, in Orlando, Fla.
Education Secretary Betsy DeVos listens at left as President Donald Trump speaks during a round table discussion at Saint Andrew Catholic School on March 3, 2017, in Orlando, Fla. The education policies Trump pursued in his first term offer clues for what a second Trump term would look like for K-12 schools.
Alex Brandon/AP
Federal From Our Research Center How Educators Say They'll Vote in the 2024 Election
Educators' feelings on Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump vary by age and the communities where they work.
4 min read
Jacob Lewis, 3, waits at a privacy booth as his grandfather, Robert Schroyer, fills out his ballot while voting at Sabillasville Elementary School, Nov. 8, 2022, in Sabillasville, Md.
Jacob Lewis, 3, waits at a privacy booth as his grandfather, Robert Schroyer, fills out his ballot while voting at Sabillasville Elementary School, Nov. 8, 2022, in Sabillasville, Md.
Julio Cortez/AP
Federal Q&A Oklahoma State Chief Ryan Walters: 'Trump's Won the Argument on Education'
The state schools chief's name comes up as Republicans discuss who could become education secretary in a second Trump administration.
8 min read
Ryan Walters, then-Republican candidate for Oklahoma State Superintendent, speaks at a rally, Nov. 1, 2022, in Oklahoma City.
Ryan Walters speaks at a rally on Nov. 1, 2022, in Oklahoma City as a candidate for state superintendent of public instruction. He won the race and has built a national profile for governing in the MAGA mold.
Sue Ogrocki/AP