69传媒

Standards & Accountability

Common-Core Tests to Take Up to 10 Hours

By Catherine Gewertz 鈥 March 12, 2013 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print
Email Copy URL

New tests being designed for students in nearly half the states will take eight to 10 hours, depending on grade level, according to guidance released last week.

The new information comes from the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers, or PARCC, one of the two big groups of states that are building tests in mathematics and English/language arts for the Common Core State Standards.

The guidance answers one of the big questions that had been hanging over the tests: Given their promises to measure students鈥 skills in a deeper, more nuanced way, partly through the use of extended performance tasks, just how long will the tests take?

The other group of states designing tests, the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium, has already come out with time estimates for its tests. 69传媒 in those 24 states will face testing times of seven to 8.5 hours. Now that PARCC has issued its test-time projections, educators in 22 other states and the District of Columbia know how much time students will need to take those exams.

In a flurry of documents issued March 5, PARCC defined not only the time needed to take the math and English/language arts tests, but also the window of time available to administer them.

69传媒 and districts will have 20 days to give the PARCC performance-based assessment, which occurs after about three-quarters of the school year and focuses on more in-depth, extended exercises. They will have another 20-day window to administer the end-of-year computer-based component, which occurs after 90 percent of the year. Those two components will make up a student鈥檚 summative score.

In addition, the consortium released an online planning tool that schools and districts can use to gauge their technological capacity to administer the computer-based tests.

The heart of PARCC鈥檚 information about testing times and windows is contained in its 鈥済uidance鈥 document. Among the key highlights of its testing plan are:

Performance-Based Test

English/language arts: Three tasks will be assigned, for which students will have to read one or more texts, answer several short comprehension and vocabulary questions, and write an essay based on evidence from what they read. The three tasks will be a research simulation, a literary analysis, and a narrative task.
Math: Each grade level will have short and extended-response questions focused on conceptual knowledge and skills as well as the math practices of reasoning and modeling.

End-Of-Year Assessment

English/language arts: 69传媒 will read four to five texts, both literary and informational, and respond to short-answer comprehension and vocabulary questions for each.
Math: It will be composed primarily of short-answer questions focused on conceptual knowledge, skills, and understandings.

Testing Sesions: Nine total

English/language arts: Three sessions for the performance-based component, two for the end-of-year one.
Math: Two sessions for the performance-based component, two for the end-of-year part.

Estimated Time On Task:

The amount of time students will have to complete both the performance-based and end-of-year components in math and English/language arts:
Grade 3: 8 hours
Grades 4-5: 9 hours, 20 minutes
Grades 6-8: 9 hours, 25 minutes
Grades 9-10: 9 hours, 45 minutes
Grades 11-12: 9 hours, 55 minutes

PARCC documents say that typical students will need those amounts of time, but that 鈥渁ll participating students will have a set amount of additional time鈥 to take the tests. That will 鈥減rovide them with ample time to demonstrate their knowledge鈥 and 鈥渞educe the need to provide increased time as an accommodation.鈥

The documents sidestep the issue of exactly how much 鈥渁dditional time鈥 will be given to students, and under what conditions. But they say that students with disabilities and those learning English will be given even more time, if it鈥檚 called for in their individualized education programs. Policies governing what accommodations are given to those students are under development.

Testing Window:

For students: Five to nine days
For schools and districts: Up to 20 days for the performance-based component of the test, and up to 20 days for the end-of-year component. 69传媒 may administer the tests in narrower windows of time if they have the capacity to do so.

PARCC documents say that testing times and windows could change, in the wake of research and field-testing, but that 鈥渕ajor changes are not anticipated.鈥

A version of this article appeared in the March 13, 2013 edition of Education Week as Common-Core Tests to Take 69传媒 Up to 10 Hours

Events

School & District Management Webinar Crafting Outcomes-Based Contracts That Work for Everyone
Discover the power of outcomes-based contracts and how they can drive student achievement.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Harnessing AI to Address Chronic Absenteeism in 69传媒
Learn how AI can help your district improve student attendance and boost academic outcomes.
Content provided by 
School & District Management Webinar EdMarketer Quick Hit: What鈥檚 Trending among K-12 Leaders?
What issues are keeping K-12 leaders up at night? Join us for EdMarketer Quick Hit: What鈥檚 Trending among K-12 Leaders?

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide 鈥 elementary, middle, high school and more.
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.

Read Next

Standards & Accountability State Accountability Systems Aren't Actually Helping 69传媒 Improve
The systems under federal education law should do more to shine a light on racial disparities in students' performance, a new report says.
6 min read
Image of a classroom under a magnifying glass.
Tarras79 and iStock/Getty
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Standards & Accountability Sponsor
Demystifying Accreditation and Accountability
Accreditation and accountability are two distinct processes with different goals, yet the distinction between them is sometimes lost among educators.
Content provided by Cognia
Various actions for strategic thinking and improvement planning process cycle
Photo provided by Cognia庐
Standards & Accountability What the Research Says More than 1 in 4 69传媒 Targeted for Improvement, Survey Finds
The new federal findings show schools also continue to struggle with absenteeism.
2 min read
Vector illustration of diverse children, students climbing up on a top of a stack of staggered books.
iStock/Getty
Standards & Accountability Opinion What鈥檚 Wrong With Online Credit Recovery? This Teacher Will Tell You
The 鈥渨hatever it takes鈥 approach to increasing graduation rates ends up deflating the value of a diploma.
5 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty