It鈥檚 not often that a journalist prompts sweeping change in America鈥檚 schools. But Emily Hanford, the creator of the 鈥淪old a Story鈥� podcast, has probably done more than any educator, official, or researcher to drive the contemporary reading revolution in America鈥檚 classrooms. A senior correspondent for American Public Media, Hanford has been an education reporter since 2008. In 2017, she got interested in how kids learn to read. Five years later, in 2022, the product was 鈥淪old a Story,鈥� a series of podcasts that won an Edward R. Murrow award, was the year鈥檚 second most-shared show on Apple podcasts, and was named one of 2023鈥檚 10 Best Podcasts by Time. I recently had the chance to chat with Hanford about 鈥淪old a Story,鈥� reading instruction, and education journalism. Here鈥檚 what she had to say.
鈥搁颈肠办
Rick: Emily, your 鈥淪old a Story鈥� podcast has had an extraordinary impact on schooling. How did it come about?
Emily: I鈥檝e been an education reporter for a long time. One story leads to another. I trace 鈥淪old a Story鈥� back to reporting I was doing years earlier. It started with questions about why many students end up in remedial classes in college. Some of those students have learning disabilities. This led me to dyslexia. That got me interested in how people learn to read. I made a in 2018 called 鈥淗ard Words鈥� that explained some basics about the body of research people refer to as the 鈥渟cience of reading.鈥� That podcast, which is also an , got the attention of a lot of people鈥攊ncluding teachers, who said they didn鈥檛 know about this research. 鈥淪old a Story鈥� was born of the question: Why?
Rick: Just what is the story that educators have been 鈥渟old鈥�?
Emily: The podcast focuses on one idea: Beginning readers don鈥檛 have to sound out written words. They can. But they don鈥檛 have to because there are other ways to figure out what the words say. It鈥檚 about why that idea is wrong and how it was sold by . They weren鈥檛 the only ones selling the idea, but they were the most successful at it. Some people think 鈥淪old a Story鈥� is about phonics. That鈥檚 not quite right. Many schools were teaching phonics. But they were also teaching beginning readers other strategies to read words. These strategies were the same ones used by struggling readers鈥攍ike looking at the first letter of a word and thinking of something that makes sense.
Rick: Why does this story matter so much?
Emily: Because being able to read matters so much. There are many reasons a child might struggle with learning how to read, such as having a reading disability, growing up in poverty, or not being read to at home. But there are decades of research鈥攚ith real kids in real classrooms鈥攖hat show, with good instruction, kids with these disadvantages can learn to read well. Instruction can be powerful. But the potential of instruction has been undercut because too many teachers didn鈥檛 know how kids learn to read and what effective instruction looked like. I get messages from teachers all the time. Some are painful messages full of guilt and regret. Others are messages of enthusiasm that show a desire to learn more and do better. Lots of the messages are both.
Rick: It seems to me that 鈥淪old a Story鈥� has done more to influence reading instruction than any number of screeds and studies. What do you think explains the podcast鈥檚 impact?
Emily: 鈥淪old a Story鈥� is about a problem that was hiding in plain sight. Those kinds of stories are powerful because they鈥檙e obvious once you point them out. 鈥淪old a Story鈥� wouldn鈥檛 have been possible without all the 鈥渟creeds and studies.鈥� My colleagues and I weren鈥檛 really reporting anything new. We were putting together a puzzle. The pieces were all there. Someone needed to assemble it and present the narrative. Narrative matters. I think 鈥淪old a Story鈥� is having an impact because it includes stories of real people鈥攃hildren, parents, and teachers鈥攚ho were harmed. Teachers are the most important audience here. They are the ones who can change children鈥檚 lives with good instruction.
Rick: How do you tell a story like this in a way that really matters?
Emily: You do a lot of interviews, make a lot of records requests, and read a lot! Compile everything into a timeline鈥攐urs starts in the 1600s and currently has more than 2,000 entries. It鈥檚 a huge amount of work to do a project like this. I have an incredible team, including my co-reporter, Christopher Peak. We initially thought it would take two years to report this story. It ended up taking longer, and there were those additional years of reporting before we began the work on 鈥淪old a Story.鈥� If we do our job right, the final product is clear and compelling, and it鈥檒l never occur to you as you are listening that it took dozens of drafts to get the story right.
Rick: Do you think it helped that this was done as a podcast?
Emily: I鈥檝e spent my entire career in audio. First radio. Now podcasts. When my first reports on this topic came out, I was distressed when numbers showed far more people were reading the stories than listening to them. That flipped with 鈥淪old a Story.鈥� One reason is we changed the way we present the stories. I used to create an audio version and then write an article that was basically a mirror of what was in the podcast鈥攕ame content, same characters. We don鈥檛 do that anymore. Because I want people to listen! There鈥檚 something powerful about hearing people tell their stories. Our voices carry a lot of emotion. A pause, a sigh, emphasis on a particular word鈥攖hose things convey so much. Also, 鈥淪old a Story鈥� is a multipart podcast. The earlier stories were one-offs. There鈥檚 something especially compelling about a serialized story. Ask Sarah Koenig or Charles Dickens!
Rick: Can you say a few words about what you鈥檙e working on now?
Emily: We鈥檙e far from done reporting on this topic. Since the original six episodes of 鈥淪old a Story鈥� were released in the fall of 2022, we have produced four additional episodes. And we have new episodes dropping on February 20. In Episode 10, we say this about where we are going with the podcast: We want to know what鈥檚 working in schools as they are changing how they teach reading. And what鈥檚 not working鈥攁nd why? There鈥檚 a lot to do! The next episodes focus on the 鈥渓ists鈥� that have come in the wake of 鈥淪old a Story"鈥攍ists of approved programs that states are encouraging, and in many cases requiring, schools to buy from. We鈥檙e digging into these lists鈥攁nd whether they鈥檙e a good idea.
Rick: Taking a step back, from where you sit, how big a shift are we really seeing in reading instruction?
Emily: I think it remains to be seen. Reid Lyon, one of the architects of 69传媒 First鈥攖he controversial federal effort more than two decades ago to focus schools on evidence-based reading鈥� he thinks this time is different. 鈥淲hat鈥檚 changed is this tremendous hunger for information,鈥� he said. 鈥淭here鈥檚 a thoughtfulness about reading in the country today. There is an actual mature conversation.鈥� I hope he is right, and I hope our work can continue to help nurture a thoughtful conversation. Like I said, more to come. Stay tuned.
Rick: How do you feel about the various 鈥渟cience of reading鈥� laws that states are passing?
Emily: My feelings are mixed. I agree with cognitive scientist Mark Seidenberg, who he views the legislation related to the science of reading as 鈥渒ind of the last resort.鈥� It鈥檚 significant that legislators are stepping up to try to do something. Teachers say that they are grateful for some of what is in these laws, such as the resources and training they want and need. However, trying to solve complex problems with top-down policies comes with complications and unintended consequences. We鈥檒l be exploring an example of that in our upcoming episodes. I鈥檓 cautiously optimistic that more kids will get the instruction they need to become better readers. But we are surrounded by threats to reading. Digital devices, video鈥攑odcasts! Kids鈥攁nd adults鈥攁re reading less and less.
Rick: Is there any one sign you鈥檝e seen when it comes to the shifts in literacy instruction that makes you particularly optimistic? Is there one that you find especially disconcerting?
Emily: I鈥檓 optimistic because so many teachers are interested in the research on reading and are eager to learn more. During 69传媒 First a narrative seemed to take hold that all of this was 鈥渁nti-teacher.鈥� That鈥檚 not the case now. Teachers are taking the lead here by sharing information with their colleagues and asking their administrators for resources and training. I do think there needs to be more collaboration between teachers and scientists. Teachers need help translating the science into practice. And scientists need help understanding the daily challenges of being a teacher. And everyone needs to be attuned to the complexity of systems change. My biggest concern is that laws and policies won鈥檛 be amended as needed because of politics or because attention has moved on to the next big thing. Improvement here requires commitment over time.
Rick: Last question. Any advice for educators when it comes to making sense of what we know about reading instruction or for sharing that with their colleagues and community?
Emily: There are a lot of downsides to technology and social media, but one of the benefits is that good information on this topic is more accessible than it was 20 years ago, during 69传媒 First. Teachers are not just sharing information. They are writing about their experiences. And there are lots of open-access articles that explain and summarize the research. Using these pieces, I put together a . I am also hosting a as the journalist-in-residence at Planet Word, the museum of words and language, in Washington. One of the themes we hope to tackle is how teachers and scientists are working together to bridge the gap between research and practice. There is still a lot to learn.
