69传媒

Special Education

Panel Weighs NCLB and 69传媒 With Disabilities

By Christina A. Samuels 鈥 April 03, 2007 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print
Email Copy URL

The federal No Child Left Behind Act has prompted a significant improvement in the education of students with disabilities, a panel of education experts told a House subcommittee last week.

However, crafting a testing policy that can adequately measure achievement of students with such a variety of needs, from mild learning disabilities to profound developmental disabilities, continues to be a challenge, as is finding highly qualified teachers to educate such students, the witnesses said.

The March 29 hearing was the latest on NCLB issues being held by the House Education and Labor Committee鈥檚 Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education. Rep. Dale E. Kildee, D-Mich., the subcommittee chairman, said that the same principles that underlie the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act also apply to NCLB. Like the IDEA, the No Child Left Behind law recognizes that children with disabilities 鈥渕ust overcome unique hurdles to get their education,鈥 he said.

鈥淭hat doesn鈥檛 mean that these children can鈥檛 achieve what their nondisabled peers achieve鈥攐nly that they need special help to achieve it,鈥 he added.

Michael L. Hardman, the incoming dean of the college of education at the University of Utah, in Salt Lake City, said that his university was trying to ensure it graduates teachers who are prepared to instruct a diverse group of students, including those with disabilities, alongside the general education population.

鈥淚n many parts of this country, general education and special education teachers are still being prepared in total isolation from each other,鈥 said Mr. Hardman, a former chairman of the university鈥檚 department of special education. Collaboration, he said, 鈥渂ecomes the key to raising expectations.鈥

Testing Challenge

States continue to have difficulties testing students with disabilities, said Rachel Quenemoen, the technical assistance team leader at the National Center on Educational Outcomes, based at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities.

The last 10 years have shown that even students with severe disabilities can demonstrate achievement in parts of the academic curriculum, a far cry from when such students were only given lessons in life skills, she said.

Because of the NCLB law鈥檚 focus on high expectations for all students, 鈥渨e now have a powerful lever鈥攑erhaps the most powerful one in the past three decades鈥攆or reducing and eliminating the achievement gap for students with disabilities,鈥 Ms. Quenemoen told the subcommittee.

But it鈥檚 important to stay focused on students with disabilities, and not try to hide their performance by adjusting testing systems so that scores for such students can be discounted, she added.

鈥淎t this point, we cannot accept the argument that we should accept far less,鈥 Ms. Quenemoen said.

Jane Rhyne, the assistant superintendent overseeing programs for exceptional children for the 129,000-student Charlotte-Mecklenburg County school district in North Carolina, also addressed the concern that students with disabilities are being overlooked through extremely large 鈥淣鈥 sizes, or the minimum subgroup size that counts toward schools鈥 and districts鈥 accountability under the federal education law.

Minimum subgroup sizes, which are set by each state, range from as few as five students to more than 40 students. One result of a large N-size is that individual schools are less likely to have to report test results for a particular subgroup.

鈥淲ith that wide disparity, a lot of students with disabilities are being left out of the accountability system,鈥 Ms. Rhyne said. She favored a recommendation from the Council of the Great City 69传媒 that N-sizes be no greater than 30 students, and that subgroup sizes should not change for different categories of students.

Rebecca H. Cort, New York state鈥檚 deputy education commissioner overseeing services for individuals with disabilities, told the subcommittee that NCLB should add provisions for students who can learn subjects at the same breadth and depth as their peers, just more slowly. That would allow a student who is reading at a 3rd grade level to be tested at that level, even if the student鈥檚 chronological age placed him or her in a higher grade. That is not currently allowed.

鈥淎 school will then be held accountable for that student鈥檚 learning on subject matter they have been taught,鈥 Ms. Cort said.

A version of this article appeared in the April 04, 2007 edition of Education Week as Panel Weighs NCLB and 69传媒 With Disabilities

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Artificial Intelligence Webinar
AI and Educational Leadership: Driving Innovation and Equity
Discover how to leverage AI to transform teaching, leadership, and administration. Network with experts and learn practical strategies.
Content provided by 
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School Climate & Safety Webinar
Investing in Success: Leading a Culture of Safety and Support
Content provided by 
Assessment K-12 Essentials Forum Making Competency-Based Learning a Reality
Join this free virtual event to hear from educators and experts working to implement competency-based education.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide 鈥 elementary, middle, high school and more.
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.

Read Next

Special Education A Guide to Bringing Neurodiverse Learners Into the Fold
Three tips for teachers and principals to accommodate learning differences.
3 min read
Neurodiversity. Thinking brain. Difference concept.
iStock/Getty Images + Education Week
Special Education 5 Key Ways to Support 69传媒 With Learning Differences
Teachers are often uncertain about how to support students who have dyslexia, dysgraphia, or dyscalculia.
4 min read
Black teacher smiling and giving a student a high five in a classroom of Black elementary students.
E+/Getty
Special Education How 69传媒 With Disabilities Fare in Both Charter and Regular Public 69传媒
69传媒 with disabilities experienced inequities in both types of schools, a new analysis shows.
6 min read
An illustration of a small person of color dragging a very large bookbag on their back.
DigitalVision Vectors
Special Education Interactive 5 Common Learning Differences in 69传媒: A Data Snapshot
Some key facts and figures about students with learning differences.
1 min read
An array of vibrantly colored brain illustrations arranged in a grid for easy examination. Categories, classifications, learning differences, brain scans.
Vanessa Solis/Education Week + DigitalVision Vectors