The PARCC assessment consortium has outlined plans for a major restructuring which is designed to make it easier for states to use its test content, and also to ensure its own long-term survival.
The revamping of the released to the assessment world on Wednesday. The document asks for bids from organizations interested in providing 鈥渟upport services"鈥攚hich means managing the PARCC consortium. Bids for the three-year contract are due Feb. 7, and the consortium plans to make its decision on March 17, according to the solicitation.
The states that currently use the PARCC test in its entirety鈥攕ix states and the District of Columbia鈥攁re looking for a new entity to manage the consortium, since their contract with its current manager, Parcc Inc., runs out in June. The contract with PARCC鈥檚 test administrator, Pearson, runs out in June 2018.
As those changes draw near, the consortium has been shaping a new vision of how it will be run, and of how it will survive, since its membership has dwindled to a half-dozen from a high of 25 states. , asking the testing field for feedback on how its reorganization should take shape.
One move it has already made is to adopt a Instead of having to buy the whole test, states were allowed to choose just some parts of it. Massachusetts and Louisiana are two states that have taken them up on that offer.
PARCC鈥檚 request for proposals, or RFP, envisions even more options for states; They can license all, some, or individual test items. They can each choose their own test-administration vendor鈥攁 role currently filled for all PARCC states by Pearson鈥攐r they can band together and use a common vendor to give the test. States can also opt for a smaller role, allowing them access only to some, but not all, test items.
The 鈥渟upport services鈥� organization would also take on a major new layer of responsibility that Parcc Inc. currently doesn鈥檛 have: test development. Right now, the consortium has a contract with Pearson to do that. But going forward, the entity that manages PARCC will handle item development itself, and will manage the item bank, according to PARCC officials.
That doesn鈥檛 necessarily mean a testing company would have to be the one to win the contract. A management organization could win it, and subcontract the test-development function to a company with that kind of expertise.
The support-services entity will also take on a quality-control role. Test content will be developed primarily by the yet-to-be-chosen organization, but it could also be developed by states, according to PARCC. If states contribute their own content, the new organization would have to vet that content for quality and format. States would retain ownership of the content they create, and could get a discount on PARCC fees in exchange for their contributions, the RFP says.
Another new twist in PARCC鈥檚 future is its planned transfer of ownership of PARCC content to a third party. The consortium is currently negotiating with an organization to serve as an 鈥渋ntellectual property holding company,鈥� to handle licensing of PARCC鈥檚 content and monitor any possible copyright infringements.
Here is the RFP, embedded for your perusing pleasure. Dive in and let us know what you think.
by on Scribd