Polls have shown that a majority of Americans are poorly informed about politics, history, geography, and science.
This past summer, Today Show weatherman Al Roker did a 鈥渕an on the street鈥� survey in which he asked fewer than a dozen randomly chosen people questions only slightly more difficult than 鈥淲ho is buried in Grant鈥檚 tomb?鈥� The 鈥減oll鈥� was totally unscientific, but not totally without meaning. It revealed what scores of scientific surveys have shown in the past鈥攖hat a majority of Americans are abysmally ignorant of, ironically, much of the 鈥渟tuff鈥� they spent so many years learning in school.
When asked how many states there are, a few adults replied 52 or 51. Only one teenager could name the three branches of government. None of the adults knew what the first 10 amendments to the Constitution are called. Two people put George Washington in the White House during the Civil War, and another named Lincoln as our first president.
The respondents appeared to be average middle-class Americans and were honest enough to be slightly embarrassed about their ignorance. And all proudly gave correct answers to such important questions as 鈥淲ho is Tom Cruise鈥檚 new girlfriend?鈥� and 鈥淲ho is Angelina Jolie now keeping company with?鈥�
On the surface, the Today Show feature was amusing; on another level, it raises some provocative questions, especially given that many surveys over the years have produced results like Roker鈥檚. Past polls have shown that a majority of Americans are poorly informed about politics, history, geography, and science. In their book What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters, Michael Delli Carpini and Scott Keeter review 3,700 survey questions that were asked between 1940 and 1994. Among other disturbing discoveries, they made the following: In 1988, just 57 percent of those questioned could locate England on a map; in 1970, only 18 percent could identify the secretary of state; and in 1952, when Americans were supposedly well-versed in civics, just 27 percent could name two branches of the federal government.
How do we explain this widespread lack of knowledge about matters that deeply affect our lives? Some argue that Americans just don鈥檛 care enough to make the effort to learn; we鈥檙e more interested in being entertained than in participating, in the frolicking of celebrities than we are in global warming.
Others believe鈥攁nd I鈥檓 among them鈥攖hat our schools鈥� obsession with memorizing content and coverage in the traditional curriculum is the main reason for Americans鈥� lack of knowledge. Without understanding why it was important to know this information or how we鈥檇 ever use it, most of us have nevertheless gone through school memorizing presidents, capitals, mountains, rivers, battles, generals, and everything else that鈥檚 useful for playing Trivial Pursuit.
James Paul Gee, professor of reading at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, calls this 鈥渃ontent fetish.鈥� He argues that schools teach academic subjects as though they鈥檙e simply bodies of facts and information that kids can learn from reading texts and listening to teachers. 69传媒 are expected to memorize the factoids for later testing. But practitioners in academic disciplines鈥攂iologists, historians, lawyers鈥攍earn through acting and interacting with the information.
Gee has written that when knowledge is treated as more than simply information, the facts come to life: 鈥淎 large body of facts that resist out-of-context memorization and rote learning becomes easier to assimilate if learners are immersed in activities and experiences that use these facts for plans, goals, and purposes within a coherent knowledge domain.鈥�
The challenges we face as individuals and as societies are ever more complex. Meeting them effectively will require extensive knowledge, but it will also require the ability to gather the knowledge, evaluate it, and apply it wisely. 69传媒 need to give first priority to helping students learn to think and use knowledge to solve problems鈥攏ot simply to pass tests.
