Several American Indian groups contend that the Bush Administration has ignored federal laws supporting Native American self-determination by proposing to privatize Indian schools.
The administration wants all 64 schools now being directly operated by the Bureau of Indian Affairs to be managed by private companies by the end of 2007, provided tribes don鈥檛 want to run them.
The Oglala Sioux Tribal Council, the Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians, and the National Congress of American Indians have all passed resolutions condemning the privatization proposal, or at least saying they oppose it until the government holds a tribal consultation. The Navajo Area School Board Association was expected to pass a resolution against the proposal this week.
But Jim C. Martin, the chief of the planning division for the BIA鈥檚 office of Indian education programs, said privatization could fit in with current federal laws governing Indian affairs. Tribes could have just as much control over schools being managed by private companies as they now do over schools run by the BIA, he said.
Even privatized schools would likely have all-Indian school boards and the BIA would still be the source of funding, Mr. Martin said.
Indian leaders say that they particularly object to the way that the privatization proposal came to light. In a so-called 鈥渏ustification document,鈥� the Bush administration鈥檚 fiscal 2003 budget request for the Department of Interior, which administers the BIA, calls for earmarking $11.9 million for a 鈥減rivatization initiative.鈥� The initiative, the document says, would 鈥渆mpower more local control of bureau-operated schools through tribes contracting/compacting schools or entering into partnerships with private enterprise to manage the schools.鈥�
Mr. Bush鈥檚 budget plan cites the poor academic performance of students at BIA schools as the rationale for privatization. It calls the schools 鈥渋neffective鈥� and says 鈥渢he president proposes to use competition to improve the worst-performing BIA-operated schools.鈥�
The privatization idea was conceived by the White House Office of Management and Budget and is part of a general push by the Bush administration to get government agencies to contract with outside providers for various functions, Mr. Martin said.
鈥淚f the Indian communities are accepting and willing, I think it鈥檚 a viable option,鈥� he said. 鈥淚 don鈥檛 think it鈥檚 going to reach the scale of 64 schools in seven years. When a community is ready, that鈥檚 when it鈥檚 going to happen.鈥�
Amy Call, a spokeswoman for the OMB, added that the president鈥檚 budget during the preparation stage is usually discussed only internally, so it鈥檚 not surprising that the government is only now scheduling consultation with tribes.
鈥淭his proposal does envision that implementation would be done with consultation of the tribes,鈥� she said.
Such consultation is scheduled for mid-May.
A Matter of Money
The Bureau of Indian Affairs already has grant or contract arrangements with tribes to operate nearly two-thirds of its 185 schools. The proposal would affect only the 64 schools鈥�39 of which are on Navajo reservations鈥攖hat aren鈥檛 yet run by tribes and are managed directly by the BIA.
Indian groups argue that, although the proposal says tribes would have the first opportunity to run the schools now operated by the BIA, in fact that option may not be viable because the budget doesn鈥檛 provide enough money to permit them to do so.
Mr. Martin disagrees, saying that tribes get enough money to run BIA schools. He acknowledged, however, that Congress, in past budgets, has not fully financed tribally run schools.
It鈥檚 unclear how much of the $11.9 million earmarked for the privatization proposal is money for the conversion of the 64 BIA-operated schools to new management, and how much would have to be shared with the 121 schools already being run by tribes.
Verner V. Duus, the legislative-affairs consultant for the National Indian Education Association, said he had been able to identify only $3 million that appeared to be new money for change of management in schools now operated by the BIA.
Documents from the BIA seem to indicate that at least $8 million of the $11.9 million would be associated with the conversion of the 64 schools. But Ms. Call, the OMB spokeswoman, said the $11.9 million represents an increase in the budget for operation of all 185 BIA schools this year over last. 鈥淚t hasn鈥檛 been determined yet how these funds will be distributed,鈥� she said.
Native American officials said in interviews that they resist privatization because it would infringe on agreements the U.S. government has with Indian people ensuring that their children have an adequate education and permitting Indians to have control over that education. As long as the BIA is managing schools, they say, tribes are assured of a relationship with the federal government and can petition Congress for treaties to be observed.
鈥淚t鈥檚 eroding our sovereignty,鈥� said Tony Garcia, a Yankton Sioux and the superintendent of a BIA grant school on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota. He鈥檚 in favor of the resolution that was passed by the Oglala Sioux tribal council opposing any changes in BIA schools on the reservation without consulting the tribe.
Facing the Fire
The privatization proposal drew criticism here in Washington recently at a conference sponsored by the National Indian Education Association on Indian education in general. A number of conference attendees also visited the offices of their members of Congress while here to express discontent over the proposal.
Bill A. Mahojah, a member of the Kaw tribe and the director of the office of Indian education programs for the BIA, faced the criticism on behalf of the Bush administration at a session of the conference.
The rationale behind the proposal, Mr. Mahojah said, is accountability. 鈥淭he people in the administration were looking at ways to improve education of Indian students in BIA schools,鈥� he said.
He mentioned that the New York City-based Edison 69传媒 Inc. would be one of a handful of private management companies that would likely be considered eligible to run BIA-financed schools.
During a comment period following Mr. Mahojah鈥檚 explanation, several Native Americans condemned the privatization proposal.
If privatization of BIA schools occurs at all, it should be done only with companies operated by Native Americans, said Verlie Ann Malina-Wright, the vice chairwoman of the Native Hawaiian Education Council. 鈥淎re we going to let an outsider come in on the reservation and tell us what to do?鈥� she said.
鈥淚t seems that the plan is set in stone, and you want to come to the tribes afterward,鈥� said Jack Lyle, a member of the Oglala Sioux Tribal Council. 鈥淲e鈥檒l oppose this until you can come up with a better alternative.鈥�
