School remained a hostile environment for LGBTQ students during the 2020-21 school year, in part because they had fewer social and instructional supports during a year of schooling that was a mix of online and in-person instruction.
That鈥檚 according to the biennial by GLSEN, an LGBTQ advocacy organization.
Over the past few survey years, the organization has tracked a decline in homophobic remarks, harassment, and bullying of LGBTQ students for their gender identities, their sexual orientation, or other characteristics. This year, that decline stagnated, according to Joseph Kosciw, director of research for GLSEN.
But during the year, schools were dealing with the pandemic and a combination of hybrid, online-only and in-person only schools, and support for LGBTQ students also declined. Supports include Gay-Straight Alliances (GSAs), inclusive curricula where LGBTQ students see themselves reflected in books, positive classroom discussions, inclusive sex education, supportive educators, and school policies that specifically ban the bullying of students for their gender identity or sexual orientation.
鈥淪ome of this may be related to changes in school instruction because of COVID,鈥� Kosciw said. 鈥淪o in that we鈥檝e seen the dip, we鈥檙e hoping that schools are now redoubling their efforts to make sure to make up for the deficit that we saw a year ago in terms of a decrease in supports.鈥�
More than 22,000 LGBTQ students between the ages of 13 and 21 took the 2020-21 survey online. These students came from all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the Northern Mariana Islands.
More support translates to better outcomes
Research has shown that when LGBTQ students feel supported in school, they are more engaged in activities and academics. They are also less likely to miss school, more likely to get better grades, and more likely to want to continue their education, Kosciw said.
69传媒 who had access to supportive educators, went to schools with inclusive policies, and had GSAs at their schools were more likely overall to feel better about themselves and not suffer from depression or suicidal ideation, the report says.
鈥淭hat鈥檚 why it鈥檚 troubling when the supports have decreased so that fewer students have these things that have such a positive effect on their lives,鈥� Kosciw said.
But just over a third of LGBTQ students鈥攁bout 34 percent鈥攕aid that their school had an active alliance or similar student club in the 2020鈥�2021 academic year, and students who were attending school in person were least likely to have access to these clubs. In previous years of the survey, more than half of LGBTQ students had reported having a GSA at school.
More than 71.6 percent of survey respondents said that their classes did not include any LGBTQ topics in class. 69传媒 who attended online or hybrid school were more likely to see positive representations of LGBTQ students in curriculum, more likely to have assigned reading about LGBTQ topics, and more likely to have inclusive sex education compared with in-person students, according to the survey results.
Some remote students got a break from harassment
The kind of harassment students faced also differed based on how they attended school.
鈥�69传媒 who were in online-only instruction obviously weren鈥檛 having experiences of in-person, verbal harassment, and physical assault, so that is in some ways a benefit that they weren鈥檛 having in-person instruction,鈥� Kosciw said. 鈥淢any still experienced online harassment, but that was not as common as students who were in person experiencing victimization.鈥�
LGBTQ students often avoid bathrooms, school buses, and hallways, where there鈥檚 no supervision by educators, in fear of verbal or physical bullying, he said. Because that was no longer a factor for online-only students, school was also safer for them.
But online schooling is not the solution for LGBTQ students to feel safer, Kosciw said. The solution is committing to supports that have proven effective.
鈥淥nline school might have been safer because you weren鈥檛 being physically bullied in school, but you may not have had the same support and have the same attachment and connection to your school community,鈥� he said.
鈥淔or many LGBTQ youth, being in school is where they can be themselves, where they can find their friends and allies but for online learning, that wasn鈥檛 happening,鈥� he continued, 鈥渟o that they didn鈥檛 have the same ability to find and meet with and connect with their peers.鈥�
