69传媒

As its headliner role at the national summit on high schools here highlighted, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has moved beyond a focus on individual schools and entered the fray of national politics and policy.

Bill Gates, the software magnate whose Seattle-based foundation has become education philanthropy鈥檚 big boy on the block, delivered a keynote address that set the stage for the two-day affair. The Microsoft Corp. chairman met with national reporters and fielded questions on education policy issues. And he matched his words with a pledge of $15 million aimed squarely at reshaping state-level policies.

Indeed, the sheer fact that the Feb. 26-27 gathering of 45 governors focused on redesigning America鈥檚 high schools鈥攁 cause the foundation has heavily invested in over the past five years鈥攚as a sign not only of the philanthropy鈥檚 growing interest in influencing policy, but also its growing success at doing so, many observers say.

鈥淕ates started out with this kind of inside-the-schoolhouse strategy, and I think what they鈥檝e realized is that trying to build these new institutions in the same old system is going to be a Sisyphean task,鈥� said Frederick M. Hess, the director of education policy studies for the American Enterprise Institute in Washington.

Convinced that the largeness and impersonality of many high schools have been barriers to student success, the Gates Foundation has committed about $1 billion to directly and indirectly support the start-up of small high schools or the restructuring of existing ones into smaller units. The foundation stresses that smallness is not an end in itself, but a tool for delivering the 鈥渢hree R鈥檚鈥� of a rigorous curriculum, relevance to students鈥� lives, and strong relationships among students, teachers, and families.

Role of Government

To date, the money has gone mostly to nonprofit organizations working to start or restructure schools in specific cities or to scale up promising school models. The foundation has generally avoided direct grants to school districts or states. (鈥淗igh 69传媒 Nationwide Paring Down,鈥� June 16, 2004.)

Yet the foundation鈥檚 high-profile involvement in the summit did not come out of the blue. Well aware that philanthropy represents only a small slice of spending on K-12 education nationwide, the foundation has been focusing increasing attention on persuading policymakers of the need for systemic change.

鈥淓ven our billion dollars is just a tiny, tiny thing in the scope of the resources that this nation must spend on education,鈥� Mr. Gates said in an interview with a half-dozen reporters during the summit. 鈥淭he bulk of the money by far will always come from government.鈥�

That Mr. Gates is hoping to shift the direction of all that government spending couldn鈥檛 be clearer. As part of a broad exhortation to 鈥渟top rationing education in America,鈥� he told the governors that redesigning a system that is now programmed, in his view, to leave large numbers of young people unprepared for college, work, or citizenship is a moral and economic imperative.

鈥淭he success of individual schools is not an answer to this crisis,鈥� he said in his keynote address. 鈥淲e have to be able to make systems of schools work for all students.鈥�

Looking for Leverage

Hoping to spur such change, the Gates Foundation joined five other philanthropies at the summit to announce a $42 million program, to be run by the National Governors Association, that will award competitive grants to support policies aimed at improving high school graduation rates and college readiness.

Specific criteria for those grants have yet to be laid out, but they are expected to track closely with a list of policy goals for states in the 鈥渁ction agenda鈥� that the NGA and Achieve Inc., the summit鈥檚 sponsors, released in advance of the gathering.

The decision to become the lead funder of the new grants program reflects the acceleration of a trend that has been under way at the Gates Foundation for several years, officials there and outside analysts agree.

鈥淭his is not a new area of emphasis for us,鈥� said Tom Vander Ark, the foundation鈥檚 executive director of education. Still, he added, 鈥渋t would be fair to say that we鈥檝e done an increasing amount of grantmaking focused on state policy in each of the last five years.鈥�

Mr. Vander Ark said such grants have gone for research, policy development, and advocacy in support of four areas that the foundation says effective systems of schools need to have: college-ready standards, strong accountability, adequate and flexible funding, and equitable school choice.

In some of the 30 cities where it

is supporting schools, the foundation has been stepping up efforts to spur systemic change. Among the most noteworthy initiatives are those in New York City and Oakland, Calif.

鈥淭hey鈥檝e clearly made a decision that they want to become more influential in the world of policy,鈥� said Bruno V. Manno, the senior associate for education for the Baltimore-based Annie E. Casey Foundation.

That being the case, the foundation鈥檚 positions on issues鈥攁nd the policy views of Mr. Gates鈥攁re likely to carry more weight, some observers say.

鈥淕iven that Gates controls this enormous pot of discretionary money, people are going to want to know how Bill Gates feels on all these different questions, and it鈥檚 going to matter,鈥� Mr. Hess said.

鈥楽ticking to This Thing鈥�

During the session with reporters, Mr. Gates fielded questions both on the foundation and its strategies and on broader topics, ranging from vouchers and the No Child Left Behind Act to the link between funding and educational quality.

Mr. Gates said the foundation was in no way backing off its position that small high schools鈥攖hose with 500 students or fewer鈥攁re the most promising 鈥渢ool鈥� for making sure that all students, and particularly those who are disadvantaged, graduate ready for college and work.

鈥淲e鈥檙e sticking to this thing,鈥� he said. 鈥淏ut we鈥檙e always open-minded to any model that can drive the final outcome.鈥�

Mr. Gates also said he didn鈥檛 expect the governors to pick up the small-schools banner, as long as they stood for needed institutional reforms.

鈥淭he key thing for the governors to say is that we鈥檙e not doing what we should for these students, and they鈥檙e willing to make the hard decisions to change that,鈥� he said. 鈥淲e鈥檙e not asking them, here鈥檚 a bumper sticker that says 鈥榮mall schools鈥� on it or something like that.鈥�

On the issue of school funding, he said, 鈥渢here are districts that aren鈥檛 getting enough money,鈥� but 鈥渕oney鈥檚 not the central issue.鈥� Evidence for that comes, he said, from high schools that are graduating large numbers of college-ready students on average budgets.

He said he considered the Bush administration鈥檚 focus on high schools 鈥済reat,鈥� but largely demurred when asked whether he thought new federal legislation in that area was necessary.

When it comes to rating the nation鈥檚 overall commitment to graduating all students ready for college and work, Mr. Gates said, 鈥淚 wouldn鈥檛 give us a passing grade.鈥� Still, he said he was not on the same page as those who see public funding for private schooling as a solution.

鈥淚 wouldn鈥檛 have chosen to give over a billion to the high school program if I wasn鈥檛 optimistic about the potential of change,鈥� he said. 鈥淥ur partners are willing to shake things up a bit as they move forward doing these things, but it鈥檚 within the framework that if you really care about the opportunity we create in this nation, you鈥檝e got to engage in the public education system.鈥�