69ý

Standards & Accountability

Ga. District’s Fiasco Prompting Reforms

By Linda Jacobson — January 21, 2009 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print
Email Copy URL

Dismayed by a school district’s loss of accreditation because of its former school board’s behavior, business leaders, educators, and other experts across Georgia have worked for months to craft recommendations for avoiding such disasters in the future.

With the legislative session now under way, some of their proposals, such as mandating training for board members and requiring ethics and conflict-of-interest policies for school boards, could become law.

Last September, the 50,000-student Clayton County district, south of Atlanta, became the first in the nation in almost 40 years to lose accreditation after misdeeds by the nine-member board. The district, with a completely new board, is working to earn back accreditation from the Southern Association of Colleges and 69ý before a one-year deadline expires. (“Loss of Accreditation Rocks Georgia District,” Sept. 3, 2008.)

Meanwhile, the five-member board for the 4,000-student Haralson County district, in the northwest part of Georgia, is accused of similar misgovernance, such as not following a chain of command and interfering with district business that is out of the realm of board members’ responsibility.

Phil Jacobs, a co-chairman of the Commission for School Board Excellence, which was created by the state board of education, said several other districts’ accreditation could also be at risk.

Mr. Jacobs said his commission’s work could serve as a model for other states.

“This wasn’t about trying to fix Clayton,” said Mr. Jacobs, the retired president of AT&T Georgia, formerly BellSouth.

Mark Elgart, the president of Advanced, the parent organization of SACS, said in a press release that the measures proposed by the commission “will position Georgia as a model state for school governance.”

AdvancED, the Georgia Chamber of Commerce, the Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce, and the Georgia Partnership for Excellence in Education—a business-led group—organized the commission, along with the state school board.

Other recommendations include a call for nonpartisan board elections and a provision that when boards are unable to govern themselves, the state board of education be allowed to intervene.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the January 21, 2009 edition of Education Week

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Artificial Intelligence Webinar
AI and Educational Leadership: Driving Innovation and Equity
Discover how to leverage AI to transform teaching, leadership, and administration. Network with experts and learn practical strategies.
Content provided by 
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School Climate & Safety Webinar
Investing in Success: Leading a Culture of Safety and Support
Content provided by 
Assessment K-12 Essentials Forum Making Competency-Based Learning a Reality
Join this free virtual event to hear from educators and experts working to implement competency-based education.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.

Read Next

Standards & Accountability State Accountability Systems Aren't Actually Helping 69ý Improve
The systems under federal education law should do more to shine a light on racial disparities in students' performance, a new report says.
6 min read
Image of a classroom under a magnifying glass.
Tarras79 and iStock/Getty
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Standards & Accountability Sponsor
Demystifying Accreditation and Accountability
Accreditation and accountability are two distinct processes with different goals, yet the distinction between them is sometimes lost among educators.
Content provided by Cognia
Various actions for strategic thinking and improvement planning process cycle
Photo provided by Cognia®
Standards & Accountability What the Research Says More than 1 in 4 69ý Targeted for Improvement, Survey Finds
The new federal findings show schools also continue to struggle with absenteeism.
2 min read
Vector illustration of diverse children, students climbing up on a top of a stack of staggered books.
iStock/Getty
Standards & Accountability Opinion What’s Wrong With Online Credit Recovery? This Teacher Will Tell You
The “whatever it takes” approach to increasing graduation rates ends up deflating the value of a diploma.
5 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty