69传媒

Dayton, Ohio

Kim Kohlrus鈥� 2nd grade classroom is alive with wiggling, chanting children. They鈥檙e on their feet, swaying and twisting as their teacher leads them in a call-and-response of letter combinations.

鈥淚-n-k, pink, ink,鈥� they chime in a bouncy rhythm, 鈥渙-n-g, song, ong.鈥� It鈥檚 a phonics warmup, to help them remember vowel-consonant groupings. Then they dive into a lesson on multisyllabic words, tackling the new challenge in various ways.

Kohlrus writes words like 鈥渒indness鈥� and 鈥渇antastic鈥� on the board, and the children tell her where to draw curved lines underneath to divide them, using the rules they鈥檝e learned about open and closed syllables. In their notebooks, they make sentences with those words and draw more curved lines to divide the sentences into phrases. For 鈥渢rick words鈥� that are hard to sound out, like 鈥渙ften,鈥� the children trace the letters on their classmates鈥� backs while saying the letters and words out loud.

These scenes play out in a typical American classroom, trimmed in cheerful shades of green and purple. But what鈥檚 happening here at Beverly Gardens Elementary reflects something less than typical: Kohlrus鈥� district, the Mad River Local 69传媒, has purposefully reshaped its early literacy instruction to reflect the science of reading.

With a clear research base to back them up, Mad River鈥檚 leaders have paired carefully structured phonics lessons in K-2 with related practices that are known to support good reading skills: helping students build content knowledge and strong vocabularies.

As the project enters its fourth year, Mad River鈥檚 leaders are hopeful. State test scores in English/language arts have risen sharply in the buildings where children have had the most exposure to the new approach, and principals notice that more students鈥攅ven the struggling ones鈥攁re better at tackling tough reading passages.

鈥淭he difference between now and five years ago, I wouldn鈥檛 have believed it,鈥� said Cory Miller, the principal of Virginia Stevenson Elementary, which dove into phonics in 2013-14, four years before Mad River adopted its new phonics curriculum, Fundations.

"[69传媒鈥橾 fluency is much better, and they鈥檙e attacking words in systematic ways,鈥� he said. 鈥淭hey鈥檙e not getting stuck on words.鈥�

Teachers and administrators in this Ohio district, which serves a working-class population near Wright-Patterson Air Force base, long knew something was missing from their literacy instruction. Most years, barely half of its 3rd graders scored proficient on state reading tests.

There was no districtwide curriculum; each teacher in its four elementary schools 鈥渄id their own thing,鈥� drawing on old Scott-Foresman textbooks or cobbling together their own materials, said Amy Holbrook, one of Mad River鈥檚 instructional coaches.

Ohio鈥檚 adoption of the Common Core State Standards in 2010 made it painfully clear: Mad River鈥檚 teachers did not have the materials they needed to meet these new standards. They tried different things without much satisfaction, Holbrook said.

A Coordinated Approach

During those years, though, the instructional coaches kept poking around. They saw the pileup of studies on the importance of systematic phonics instruction. They took an online course in foundational skills created by Student Achievement Partners, a nonprofit created by the common core鈥檚 main writers, and later taught a version of it to all their K-2 teachers. It was becoming apparent to the coaches that the district needed a coordinated approach to reading, and teachers were increasingly asking for one, Holbrook said.

They found two curricula that covered the foundational skills that research calls for, and tried them out. In 2016-17 they used Wit & Wisdom, designed by Great Minds to build content knowledge, comprehension, and vocabulary, schoolwide in one elementary building, and in scattered grades and classrooms in other buildings. The following year, the district expanded Wit & Wisdom to all K-8 classrooms and added Fundations, a program that includes phonics by Wilson Language Training, in all K-2 classrooms. (Fundations met most, but not all, of the requirements for a good-quality phonics program in a recent review by the curriculum reviewer EdReports.)

A couple of fall mornings in Kohlrus鈥� classroom offered a glimpse of what the combination looks like. After reading aloud to her 17 students from a picture book, she gave them free-reading time, letting them choose books from the themed baskets in her classroom library (鈥渇amily,鈥� 鈥渂iographies,鈥� 鈥渁nimal babies鈥�).

While the children read, Kohlrus worked on reading fluency with three boys at a small table. They read aloud from a Wit & Wisdom handout in the curriculum鈥檚 current module, which is organized around the theme of change. 鈥淚n the fall, many things are changing,鈥� Channing Wray read aloud. As he read, Kohlrus helped him sound out tricky words.

As a whole group, the class then focused again on phonics. At their desks, the children divided words into syllables, or sentences into phrases, and said them aloud together. They stood up to chant letter sounds or move around the room in an exercise about prefixes and suffixes. Each child had a word written on a strip of paper (鈥渃onnect鈥�) and had to find a companion whose paper showed a prefix or suffix that changes its meaning (鈥渄is-").

Moving into the comprehension piece of the lesson, Kohlrus used themed sets of books to explore ideas and language. In a book about why fall leaves change color, the children learned about chlorophyll and pigments, and they discussed vocabulary words, using their bodies to act out words like 鈥渃url鈥� and 鈥渦ncurl.鈥� They explored the text structure, too, identifying topic sentences, bits of evidence, and conclusions.

Kohlrus is a convert to the new literacy approach, but she hated it at first. She was teaching kindergarten then, and thought the new curricula expected too much too soon from 5-year-olds. She also didn鈥檛 like the carefully scripted nature of Fundations. 鈥淚 like to add my own flair, and it felt limiting to me,鈥� she said.

Like many teachers, Kohlrus didn鈥檛 hear much about phonics in her teacher-prep program nearly 20 years ago, or in her master鈥檚 program in literacy. Those courses were infused with the ideas that shaped the 鈥渨hole language鈥� approach to literacy that鈥檚 now out of favor but many critics say persists in U.S. classrooms under the guise of balanced literacy.

Kohlrus used those ideas鈥攊ncluding the 鈥渃ueing systems鈥� that encourage children to use pictures and other clues to guess what words say鈥攖o shape her reading instruction over 17 years of teaching kindergarten and 1st grade. Here and there, she wove in bits of phonics instruction she felt were appropriate for 5- and 6-year-olds.

Being asked to embrace a structured, systematic phonics program 鈥渕eant unlearning everything I鈥檇 learned,鈥� Kohlrus said. Instructional coaches provided training, but even still, the challenges of the phonics shift, combined with learning two new, demanding curricula 鈥渕ade us all want to get in the fetal position and cry,鈥� she said.

As she began teaching 2nd grade last year, Kohlrus felt her mind shifting, she said. She began to see the sense in the new approach.

鈥淚 have finally bought into it,鈥� she said. 鈥淚 can see the skills the children are bringing into 2nd grade. It鈥檚 making a difference. Now these kids have solid phonics skills. They can go past sounding out letters to sounding out multisyllabic words like nobody鈥檚 business.鈥�

Kohlrus doesn鈥檛 spend much time lamenting the way she taught reading in the past, but sometimes it bothers her. 鈥淚 used what I had,鈥� she said. 鈥淎nd that was all I had.鈥�

Changing a System

Many teachers resist abandoning what they learned about teaching reading, since they trusted their preparation programs to provide the best advice, Mad River鈥檚 coaches said. Ann Pearce, who travels nationwide to train teachers in Fundations, sees this all the time.

鈥淵ou run into, 鈥榃e didn鈥檛 learn this, so is this the right thing to do?鈥� They didn鈥檛 learn systematic phonics, and then to be expected to teach this way, it鈥檚 hard,鈥� Pearce said. 鈥淚 tell teachers, I got my master鈥檚 in reading, and I never learned any of this. But when I did learn, it was an eye-opener.鈥�

One of the toughest pieces of the transition to a phonics-based literacy approach is that teachers often wrestle with beliefs about themselves, said Mad River instructional coach Rebecca Parker. She was teaching 3rd grade when the district started its new literacy approach, and she thought it was too hard for her students. That resistance sparked a difficult internal journey.

鈥淚 started to ask myself, do I believe that 鈥榢ids can鈥�? I finally realized it was about me, that what I really wondered about was if I could help them, if I was good enough,鈥� she said. 鈥淏ut now there鈥檚 evidence in front of me. The kids showed me they could do it.

鈥淭eaching is very personal and emotional. This [change] pushes you to reflect on yourself. It was scary, and it brought me to my knees. But I learned to focus on the students, and not on myself.鈥�

Struggling to Maintain Focus

A big challenge in moving to a comprehensive literacy approach, Holbrook says, has been watching the district鈥檚 attention to it ebb and flow.

Dubbed a 鈥渇ocus district鈥� by the state, Mad River redeployed its instructional coaches from the literacy project to broader duties; only one now is devoted to that project, instead of three. The district has ongoing struggles with absenteeism, had to grapple with a technology crisis, and has had to siphon attention to training staff to handle trauma from opioid use in its students鈥� families.

Krista Wagner, the assistant superintendent who oversees curriculum and instruction, as well as student services, said she 鈥渇eels horrible鈥� about the uneven focus on the literacy initiative.

鈥淲e鈥檙e right there where things are starting to take a turn,鈥� she said. 鈥淚 know it feels as if sometimes more attention is on it and sometimes less is on it. But we鈥檙e fully committed to it.鈥�

There are signs that the literacy work is paying off: Scores on state tests in English/language arts have risen districtwide since the two new curricula arrived, particularly in two schools using the approach the longest. In the elementary school that has had both curricula the longest, 3rd grade test scores went from the worst in the district鈥�44 percent proficient in 2016鈥攖o the best, 71 percent in 2019. Third grade reading proficiency districtwide moved from 53 percent in 2016 to 64 percent in 2019.

But it鈥檚 hard to know what really drove those improvements. Was it the phonics program or the knowledge-building curriculum that made the difference? Or did other dynamics produce the score improvements? Wagner and the instructional coaches can鈥檛 tell. The district switched interim-assessment providers, making it hard to track the impact of the new curricula. Fundations and Wit & Wisdom also include interim tests, but teachers are still learning to use them in uniform ways, so consistent data across school buildings aren鈥檛 available yet, Holbrook said.

Even without those data, though, Mad River鈥檚 leaders feel they鈥檙e onto something important. And as they move forward, they鈥檙e keenly aware of the stakes riding on their work.

鈥淚f kids aren鈥檛 hitting 3rd or 4th grade using all these foundational skills to access complex text, we鈥檒l have kids guessing. We鈥檒l have huge gaps,鈥� Holbrook said. 鈥淎nd we won鈥檛 be overcoming that in high school.鈥�