69传媒

The overturning of Roe v. Wade has far-reaching implications for constitutional interpretation, individual rights, and health care鈥攊ssues that are at the core of social studies and sex education classes.

The U.S. Supreme Court鈥檚 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women鈥檚 Health Organization, which ruled that the U.S. Constitution does not protect a right to abortion, will change the way that teachers of government and civics discuss legal precedent and the right to privacy, and how U.S. history teachers explain the effects of the women鈥檚 rights movement. And it may lead students to raise questions in health or sex education classes that teachers in some states are prohibited from answering.

鈥淸The case] actually has a lot more of a ricochet through the teaching field than I think a lot of teachers might realize before they teach this topic,鈥� said Kerry Sautner, the chief learning officer at the National Constitution Center, which provides resources and lessons for teachers.

Teachers鈥� response to the Dobbs decision will play out against the backdrop of increased scrutiny on how schools are teaching about current events and social issues. Since January 2021, 17 states have imposed restrictions on how teachers can discuss race, sex, gender, or other issues deemed controversial.

鈥淗istory teachers in particular are feeling a lot of pressure, and feel like there鈥檚 a magnifying glass on what they鈥檙e doing,鈥� said Sheila Edwards, a middle school history teacher in Covina, Calif.

This summer, Edwards facilitated a civil dialogue course for teachers with the National Constitution Center, in which participants talked about how to approach Roe and Dobbs. 鈥淭here were some teachers who were in tears saying, 鈥業 know what I should do, but I don鈥檛 know if I can do it,鈥欌�� Edwards said.

Roe specifically, and abortion more generally, are largely absent from teaching standards鈥攖he documents that spell out what students should know and be able to do at each grade. Only 15 states mention Roe v. Wade in their social studies standards, according to a . Most states don鈥檛 reference abortion in sex education standards, though .

Still, some teachers feel like they need to give students an opportunity to discuss the current and future implications of the Dobbs decision.

鈥�69传媒 are tired of the current state of political discourse in this country,鈥� said Allison Cohen, an AP government teacher at Langley High School in McLean, Va. 鈥淭hey want this space where they can have these conversations that aren鈥檛 just people yelling talking points at each other.鈥�

Read on for suggestions from teachers, teacher educators, and other experts about where Roe and Dobbs shows up in standards and curriculum鈥攁nd how teachers might approach these conversations.

Government, law, and the Constitution

Roe was a central precedent in constitutional law, so the implications for government and politics teachers are broad, said Sautner.

In the minority of states that mention Roe in their standards, it鈥檚 often discussed in relation to the reach of the 14th Amendment and the expansion of civil liberties.

Now that Roe has been overturned, the takeaways for students will be different, Sautner said. And there are open questions of constitutional interpretation: For instance, how does the decision in Dobbs affect other cases that convey a right to privacy?

Teachers can also talk about the importance of state law, she said: 鈥淭here is a lot of this undecided and gray area that is such a brilliant way to teach federalism. Where are the goal posts set by the decision? How are they a little vague and a little unclear, and how are states working around that?鈥�

These are all topics that fit naturally into most high school government courses. But Edwards, the middle school history teacher, said she might discuss Dobbs this coming school year too if her students are curious about the decision. 鈥淲e have to grab that interest where it lies. So if lies with Dobbs, I鈥檓 going to do it,鈥� she said.

In thinking about how she might structure a lesson, Edwards is planning to have students read both the main decision and the dissent. That way, the conversation is less about students鈥� personal positions, and more focused on their analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of different arguments.

She hopes to convey that these debates are playing out in real time, and that it鈥檚 OK for students to feel like they don鈥檛 have all the answers. 鈥淪aying that you don鈥檛 know something is a really wise thing to do,鈥� Edwards said.

For more on how the Dobbs decision is changing government and politics courses, including Advanced Placement United States Government and Politics, see this story.

History and other social studies courses

While most states reference Roe in relation to constitutional precedent, there are a few states鈥擬assachusetts, New York, and Oklahoma鈥攖hat situate Roe as part of the women鈥檚 rights movement.

For example, Massachusetts鈥� high school standards ask students to 鈥渁nalyze the causes and course of the women鈥檚 rights movement in the 1960s and 1970s,鈥� listing topics including Roe, but also the birth control pill, the National Organization of Women, and the Equal Rights Amendment.

And if Roe and abortion aren鈥檛 specifically mentioned in most state standards about the women鈥檚 movement, teachers can still weave the topics into discussion of that era, said Lauren Colley, an assistant professor of integrated social studies education at the University of Cincinnati.

Abortion history goes back even farther than that, though. States started passing anti-abortion laws in the early- and mid-1800s. By the late 19th century, the procedure was criminalized or restricted in every state, with exceptions for abortions performed by doctors to save a woman鈥檚 life, said Leslie Reagan, a history professor at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, and the author of the book When Abortion Was a Crime. Reagan spoke at a July 28th webinar hosted by the National Council for the Social Studies.

But in the 18th and early 19th centuries, abortion wasn鈥檛 considered illegal under common law if it was performed before the 鈥渜uickening鈥濃�攖he first time that fetal movement could be felt, Reagan said. It was regularly practiced, and usually induced with herbal remedies, she said.

Teaching about abortion, Roe, and Dobbs is one way to talk about reproductive rights and reproductive justice鈥攌ey themes in women鈥檚 history, Colley said. But it doesn鈥檛 have to be limited to Roe: There are opportunities to examine other topics through this lens, too. Throughout U.S. history, Colley said, people have fought to have control over their reproductive health and for the right to raise their children.

This thread of historical analysis can be woven through many commonly taught topics鈥攆or example, as way to discuss sexual violence during slavery. 鈥淥ftentimes teachers talk about the coerced physical labor, but we brush over the coerced reproductive labor,鈥� Colley said.

Taking this approach, though, can be especially fraught right now. Educators say that the growing movement to restrict how they can discuss race, sex, and gender in the classroom has left them unsure what historical events they鈥檙e allowed to talk about.

Sex-related topics can feel among the most challenging. Some that among all taboo topics, teachers are discussing sex and sexual identity in class, Colley said.

But classroom conversations about abortion don鈥檛 have to be debates over morality or religion, Colley said. Instead, she said, teachers can focus lessons on inquiry, asking students to explore the policy implications of the Dobbs decision and examine the history of abortion as a part of social movements.

The anti-abortion movement that strengthened in the years after the Roe decision, for example, has been hugely influential in shaping political discourse around the issue, state laws, and ideologically aligned courts.

Health and sex education

Surprisingly, sex education standards largely avoid abortion to an even greater degree than social studies standards.

Only nine states and the District of Columbia have guidance or policies about whether or how to discuss abortion in sex education, according to a from the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States, or SIECUS, a nonprofit that promotes comprehensive sex education.

Of these states, six prohibit discussion of abortion as a potential outcome of pregnancy. South Carolina, for example, bans talking about abortion .

Two states鈥擵ermont and Colorado鈥攁nd D.C. are 鈥渁ffirming鈥� of abortion as an option. But even if a state does require courses to cover abortion, it鈥檚 not guaranteed that students will learn about it. That鈥檚 because not all states mandate that schools offer sex education, and even those that do leave the curriculum almost entirely up to districts to craft. After the Dobbs decision, several news stories noted that many of the states that planned to restrict access to or ban abortion do not mandate sex education.

In the past few years, some states have added additional restrictions to sex education programs. Arkansas, for example, passed a law in 2021 that prohibited schools from contracting with any person or entity that 鈥渃ounsels in favor of abortion.鈥� Also last year, Montana banned schools from working with any provider of sex education that also provides abortion services.

On the other end of the spectrum is Illinois, which adopted the in 2021. The standards span from grades K-12 and teach about topics such as consent, healthy communication, and sexual and gender identity. Their adoption was applauded by advocates of comprehensive sex education, but has received backlash as well from Republican state legislators.

The national standards say that 8th graders should be able to identify abortion as one outcome of pregnancy, alongside parenting and adoption. Tenth graders are expected to analyze the laws that address sexual health services for minors, including abortion, and identify reliable sources of information on the procedure. In 12th grade, students analyze societal factors that can influence decisions about pregnancy options, including abortion.

Illinois schools can choose to opt-out of these standards, and many have done so.