A multistate effort to create a repository of free, open content is being designed to allow a wide variety of audiences鈥攊ncluding commercial vendors鈥攖o take those resources, and build upon them.
The K-12 OER Collaborative recently announced that it had awarded $1.3 million to 10 content developers to develop 2-3 week open academic units in English/language arts and math.
Those resources, designed to align with the common-core, are expected to serve as the foundation for more extensive, year-long academic materials.
But while some open licenses, such as the one used by EngageNY, give the original, open content developers a route to commercialize their work, the K-12 OER Collaborative goes much further. Its license allows any entity鈥攆or-profit or nonprofit鈥攖o distribute, remix, and build upon that original work, as long as they credit the original source.
In using that license, the K-12 OER Collaborative鈥檚 goal is to not only allow schools to benefit from the free, open materials, but to also give other audiences鈥攏o matter their affiliation鈥攖he chance to try to improve upon the materials, said Cable T. Green, the director of global learning for Creative Commons, which is supporting the collaborative.
The collaborative鈥檚 message to entrepreneurs is an unabashed 鈥渉ere鈥攇o take it,鈥� Mr. Green said. (One of the collaborative鈥檚 financial supporters is The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. The foundation also supports Education Week鈥榮 coverage of 鈥渄eeper learning.鈥� The newspaper retains sole editorial control over the content of this coverage.)
Commercial publishers鈥� interest in the K-12 OER Collaborative鈥檚 resources will likely depend on their quality and usefulness to teachers, said Jay Diskey, the executive director of the pre-K-12 division of the Association of American Publishers.
鈥淎re they creating yesterday鈥檚 textbooks,鈥� Mr. Diskey said, 鈥渙r something that鈥檚 a viable product in today鈥檚 market?鈥�
N.Y. 鈥極pen鈥� Education Effort Draws Users Nationwide
While it鈥檚 true a for-profit company could benefit from taking the collaborative鈥檚 free and open resources, the organization鈥檚 model includes built-in checks and balances on that activity, said Jennifer A. Wolfe, a partner with the Learning Accelerator, a nonprofit helping fund the effort.
Since free, open resources will be available through the collaborative, a vendor will have to justify to consumers why its product is superior and schools should pay for it, Ms. Wolfe said in an e-mail.
Yet if a vendor makes changes to the open content that are so attractive schools demand to buy it, she added, that鈥檚 鈥渆xactly the kind of innovation we are trying to encourage.鈥�
