69传媒

Law & Courts

A Charter School Made Girls Wear Skirts to Promote 鈥楥hivalry.鈥 An Appeals Court Says No

By Mark Walsh 鈥 June 15, 2022 4 min read
Scales of justice and Gavel on wooden table and Lawyer or Judge working with agreement in Courtroom, Justice and Law concept.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print
Email Copy URL

A federal appeals court has ruled that a North Carolina charter school organized around traditional values and 鈥渃hivalry鈥 violated the 14th Amendment鈥檚 equal-protection clause with its requirement that girls wear skirts.

The court further ruled that public school dress codes that discriminate on the basis of sex fall under the federal Title IX law, and it sent the case back to a trial court for further proceedings on that issue.

The decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit, in Richmond, Va., comes in a case that could also prove significant for the legal status of charter schools as public or government actors as well as on the legality of dress codes.

The 101 pages of opinions include lively exchanges among the judges over chivalry and other values of the Middle Ages, the educational innovations and legal status of charter schools, and gender stereotypes in education.

The schools 鈥渟tereotyped rationale for the skirts requirement鈥攖hat girls are 鈥榝ragile鈥 and require protection by boys鈥攊s both offensive and archaic,鈥 wrote Judge Barbara Milano Keenan, in a concurrence joined by another judge.

Writing one of two dissents in the case, Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III said the majority decision 鈥渨ill drape a pall of orthodoxy over charter schools and shift educational choice and diversity into reverse.鈥

鈥淭o a great many people, dress codes represent an ideal of chivalry that is not patronizing to women, but appreciative and respectful of them,鈥 said Wilkinson, whose opinion was joined by two other judges.

The majority said chivalry in the 鈥渁ge of knighthood鈥 was grimmer than Wilkinson suggests, citing historical research suggesting that men could assault their spouses with impunity during that age.

鈥淐hivalry may not have been a bed of roses for those forced to lie in it,鈥 Keenan wrote in the majority opinion in

The sharp opinions come in an important decision on charter schools and gender bias

The long-running case involves a Charter Day School, a K-8 school in Leland, N.C., which teaches a classical curriculum and bars girls from wearing pants or shorts, instead requiring skirts or jumpers.

Some parents challenged the policy under the equal-protection clause and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which bars discrimination based on sex in federally funded schools.

A federal district judge ruled in 2019 that the charter holder operated under state authority when it incorporated its disparate dress code into its disciplinary rules. The judge held that the dress code violated the 14th Amendment鈥檚 equal-protection clause. But the judge held that Title IX did not apply to dress codes.

A three-judge held that neither the charter school nor the private manager that ran it were state actors and thus the policy could not be challenged on constitutional grounds. But the panel said the district judge was wrong on Title IX and that dress codes did come under the statute.

The full 4th Circuit set aside that panel ruling to review the district court decision anew. In its June 14 ruling, the court held 10-6 that the charter school was a state actor and that the skirt policy violated the equal-protection clause. (That same lineup agreed the private charter manager was not a state actor.)

The majority said the school鈥檚 skirt policy was based on 鈥渋mpermissible gender stereotypes.鈥

鈥淐DS has imposed the skirts requirement with the express purpose of telegraphing to children that girls are 鈥榝ragile,鈥 require protection by boys, and warrant different treatment than male students, stereotypes with potentially devastating consequences for young girls,鈥 Keenan wrote for the majority.

The six judges who dissented on that issue argued that the charter school was not a state actor under North Carolina law.

鈥淢y worry is that the majority鈥檚 reasoning transforms all charter schools in North Carolina, and likely all charter schools in the other states that form our circuit, into state actors鈥 and will stifle educational innovation, said Judge A. Marvin Quattlebaum Jr.

The court ruled 13-3 that Title IX encompasses sex discrimination in school dress codes. The majority was not persuaded by the fact that the U.S. Department of Education, in 1982, had rescinded a regulation prohibiting discrimination against any person based on 鈥渞ules of appearance.鈥

鈥淏ased on the plain language and structure of the statute, we conclude that Title IX unambiguously encompasses sex-based dress codes promulgated by covered entities,鈥 the majority said. (Because the statute was unambiguous, the court said, it was not deferring to the Education Department鈥檚 1982 regulatory change.)

Wilkinson, dissenting on the Title IX issue, noted that the Education Department said in 1982 that appearance codes were an issue 鈥渇or local determination.鈥

鈥淪urely CDS did not unambiguously give up its right to adopt a traditional sex-specific dress code merely by accepting a dollar of federal funds,鈥 Wilkinson said.

Events

School & District Management Webinar Crafting Outcomes-Based Contracts That Work for Everyone
Discover the power of outcomes-based contracts and how they can drive student achievement.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Harnessing AI to Address Chronic Absenteeism in 69传媒
Learn how AI can help your district improve student attendance and boost academic outcomes.
Content provided by 
School & District Management Webinar EdMarketer Quick Hit: What鈥檚 Trending among K-12 Leaders?
What issues are keeping K-12 leaders up at night? Join us for EdMarketer Quick Hit: What鈥檚 Trending among K-12 Leaders?

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide 鈥 elementary, middle, high school and more.
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.

Read Next

Law & Courts The Uncertainty Ahead for Title IX and Transgender 69传媒 in Trump's New Term
Trump may not be able to withdraw the Title IX rule on "Day 1," but advocates on both sides expect it to go away.
7 min read
Marshall University students hold a protest to voice concerns over the handling of Title IX-related issues at the university on Nov. 18, 2022, in Huntington, W.Va.
Marshall University students hold a protest to voice concerns over the handling of Title IX-related issues at the university on Nov. 18, 2022, in Huntington, W.Va.
Sholten Singer/The Herald-Dispatch via AP
Law & Courts Ten Commandments Law for Public 69传媒 Is 'Impermissible,' Judge Rules
The Louisiana law would require displays of the Ten Commandments in every public school classroom.
4 min read
Photo of Ten Commandments poster on school wall.
Getty
Law & Courts Supreme Court Weighs High-Stakes Fraud Issue for E-Rate Program
The justices appear to lean toward a ruling that could help keep schools from being overcharged by telecommunications companies.
8 min read
Image of students working on a computer.
Carlos Barquero Perez/iStock/Getty
Law & Courts Court Battles and Presidential Election Have Big Implications for Title IX Regulation
A federal appeals court heard arguments about whether some provisions of the Title IX regulation should be allowed to go into wider effect.
4 min read
Image of a gavel
iStock/Getty