69ý

Law & Courts

Biden Admin. Asks Supreme Court to Allow Part of Title IX Rule to Take Effect

By Mark Walsh — July 22, 2024 3 min read
The Supreme Court building is seen on Friday, June 28, 2024, in Washington.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print
Email Copy URL

The Biden administration moved swiftly on Monday to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to partially set aside two lower-court injunctions that block the Department of Education’s new Title IX regulation from taking effect in 10 states.

Just days after two federal appeals courts had refused to intervene in separate challenges, U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar asked the high court to allow most of the Title IX rule to take effect on Aug. 1 even as the administration went along with pausing the key provisions being challenged that are meant to clarify that the law bars discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation.

“The district court plainly erred in enjoining dozens of provisions that [states and other plaintiffs] have not challenged and that the court did not find likely unlawful,” Prelogar said in an emergency application to the high court in a case brought by Louisiana and three other states, along with several Louisiana school districts.

A federal district judge on June 13 issued an injunction blocking the entire new Title IX regulation in Louisiana, as well as Idaho, Mississippi, and Montana. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, in New Orleans, the Biden administration’s request for a partial stay, by a 2-1 panel vote.

“The district court’s injunction would block the department from implementing dozens of provisions of an important rule effectuating Title IX, a vital civil rights law protecting millions of students against sex discrimination,” Prelogar said in .

She filed a nearly identical request for relief in , a case in which a federal district judge on June 17 blocked the entire new Title IX rule in Tennessee, Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, Virginia, and West Virginia. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, in Cincinnati, in , refused the administration’s request to partially set aside the injunction.

Title IX rule’s provisions on sexual harassment, pregnancy at risk of being blocked, solicitor general argues

Prelogar said in the filings that the lower courts had incorrectly blocked provisions on gender identity, but the administration was not seeking to set aside the injunctions with respect to the gender-identity language for now.

“Those provisions raise important issues that will be litigated on appeal and that may well require this court’s resolution in the ordinary course,” the solicitor general said.

But the lengthy new regulation also includes many other provisions not being challenged by the states, including on how schools and colleges should handle sexual harassment and providing new protections for pregnant students, Prelogar said.

The solicitor general emphasized in both filings that the Supreme Court itself had recently scaled back a sweeping preliminary injunction because it had “flouted the fundamental principle that equitable relief must not be more burdensome to the defendant than necessary to redress the plaintiff’s injuries.”

She was referring to , in which the high court on April 15 set aside a federal district court injunction that had blocked an Idaho law that limits medical treatments for transgender children. The vote was 6-3 along the court’s traditional ideological lines, with several written opinions.

Prelogar quoted from a concurring opinion by Justice Neil M. Gorsuch that lower courts would be “wise to take heed” of a reminder about the limits of their equitable powers.

The filings in the Title IX cases came on the court’s emergency docket, so even though the justices are on their summer recess, they could ask the state and school district challengers to respond to the solicitor general and then could decide whether to grant the relief sought by the solicitor general.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Artificial Intelligence Webinar
AI and Educational Leadership: Driving Innovation and Equity
Discover how to leverage AI to transform teaching, leadership, and administration. Network with experts and learn practical strategies.
Content provided by 
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School Climate & Safety Webinar
Investing in Success: Leading a Culture of Safety and Support
Content provided by 
Assessment K-12 Essentials Forum Making Competency-Based Learning a Reality
Join this free virtual event to hear from educators and experts working to implement competency-based education.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.

Read Next

Law & Courts Court Battles and Presidential Election Have Big Implications for Title IX Regulation
A federal appeals court heard arguments about whether some provisions of the Title IX regulation should be allowed to go into wider effect.
4 min read
Image of a gavel
iStock/Getty
Law & Courts Top Affirmative Action Foe Has New Target: Scholarships for Aspiring Minority Teachers
The legal activist behind the U.S. Supreme Court college admissions decision has now sued over an Illinois minority scholarship program.
3 min read
A picture of a gavel on a target.
Bill Oxford/Getty
Law & Courts This State Requires 69ý to Teach the Bible. Parents and Teachers Are Suing
Opponents of an Oklahoma directive that compels schools to teach the Bible are suing the state’s superintendent of public instruction.
4 min read
Image of a young boy pulling the bible off of a bookshelf.
D-Keine/E+
Law & Courts States Sue TikTok Over 'Addictive' Design Features. What That Means for 69ý
The lawsuits are the newest fight targeting social media platforms' algorithms.
3 min read
The United States government laws on certain social media applications such as TikTok
iStock/Getty