69´«Ã½

Law & Courts

Supreme Court Won’t Take Up Case on District’s Gender Transition Policy

By Mark Walsh — December 09, 2024 4 min read
The Supreme Court is pictured, June 30, 2024, in Washington.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print
Email Copy URL

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear a case about a school district’s policy to support students undergoing gender transitions. But three justices said they would have taken up the challenge by a group of parents who contend the policy unconstitutionally excludes them from important decisions about their children.

Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., in a dissent from the denial of review joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, said the case “presents a question of great and growing national importance: whether a public school district violates parents’ fundamental constitutional right to make decisions concerning the rearing of their children … when, without parental knowledge or consent, it encourages a student to transition to a new gender or assists in that process.â€

“We are told that more than 1,000 districts have adopted such policies,†Alito said in the dissent in .

See also

Demonstrators advocating for transgender rights and healthcare stand outside of the Ohio Statehouse on Jan. 24, 2024, in Columbus, Ohio. Republican states are filing a barrage of legal challenges against the Biden administration's newly expanded campus sexual assault rules, saying they overstep the president's authority and undermine the Title IX anti-discrimination law.
Demonstrators advocating for transgender rights and healthcare stand outside of the Ohio Statehouse on Jan. 24, 2024, in Columbus, Ohio. Roughly 3 percent of high school students identify as transgender, and they face high levels of bullying and hopelessness, according to new data.
Patrick Orsagos/AP

At issue in the case is the 10,700-student Eau Claire district’s 2021 administrative guidance on “gender identity support.†The guidance calls for staff members to develop such plans “when appropriate or necessary†for transgender, non-binary, or gender-nonconforming students. The plans might address restroom use, athletic participation, or social, medical, surgical, or legal processes.

Because some students are not open about their gender transitions at home, the policy contemplates instances in which parents would not be involved in creating the gender support plan.

Alito, in his dissent, highlighted a facilitator guide that said, “Parents are not entitled to know their kids’ identities. That knowledge must be earned.â€

The guidance was challenged by an informal parents’ association, based on parents’ 14th Amendment substantive-due-process right to control the upbringing of their children. But two lower courts did not rule on the merits of their challenge because they concluded that the parents’ group lacked standing to bring the suit.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, in Chicago, held in March that parents could not challenge the district’s policy unless they could show that their child was transitioning or considering a gender transition.

Dissenting justices claim such policies ‘keep parents in the dark’

In his dissent, Alito said “the challenged policy and associated equity training specifically encourage school personnel to keep parents in the dark about the ‘identities’ of their children, especially if the school believes that the parents would not support what the school thinks is appropriate. Thus, the parents’ fear that the school district might make decisions for their children without their knowledge and consent is not speculative.â€

Alito said he would grant review so the court could address lower courts’ questionable view of one of the Supreme Court’s key precedents on what gives someone appropriate standing to bring a lawsuit, which he said was leading some of those courts to avoid ruling on the merits of “some particularly contentious constitutional questions.â€

Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh indicated that he would grant review of the case, but he gave no explanation and he did not sign onto Alito’s dissent.

Last May, the Supreme Court declined to take up a similar case from Montgomery County, Md., in an appeal of a decision by a different federal appeals court that a parents’ group lacked standing to address that district’s gender support guidance. No member of the high court dissented from that action, in Parents 1 v. Montgomery County Board of Education.

In the Wisconsin case, the parents group, backed by the America First Legal Foundation, a conservative group led by Stephen Miller, who will soon be President-elect Donald Trump’s deputy chief of staff for domestic policy, and the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty, a conservative group focused on the Badger state, argued to the high court that the 1,000 or more districts that have adopted gender support policies are doing so with the clear exclusion of parents from the process and even hiding important information about their children from them.

“School is now like Las Vegas,†. “What happens at school stays at school.â€

See also

Parents, students, and staff of Chino Valley Unified School District hold up flags and signs in favor of protecting LGBTQ+ policies at the school board meeting held at Don Antonio Lugo High School on June 15, 2023, in Chino, Calif.
Parents, students, and staff of Chino Valley Unified School District hold up flags and signs in favor of protecting LGBTQ+ policies at a school board meeting on June 15, 2023, in Chino, Calif. The district is now suing Gov. Gavin Newsom over a new law banning districts from requiring educators to notify parents if their child requests to use a different name or pronouns in school.
Anjali Sharif-Paul/The Orange County Register via AP

The Eau Claire district, urging the court not to take up the case, said the parents’ group mischaracterized the administrative guidance. Even when a student does not want their parent to participate in a gender support plan, such plans are school records that are kept in the student’s files and would be available to parents at any time.

The parents’ group “based its lawsuit on a claim that at some unknown point in the future one of its members’ children might identify as transgender, and if so, they might request gender support from the district, and then, further, they might also request that the district not immediately notify their parent of these facts,†the school district said in its brief. “[The parent group’s] claim of possible future harm is completely dependent upon this highly attenuated chain of future possibilities that may never occur.â€

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Special Education Webinar
Don’t Count Them Out: Dyscalculia Support from PreK-Career
Join Dr. Elliott and Dr. Wall as they empower educators to support students with dyscalculia to envision successful careers and leadership roles.
Content provided by 
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being Webinar
Improve School Culture and Engage 69´«Ã½: Archery’s Critical Role in Education
Changing lives one arrow at a time. Find out why administrators and principals are raving about archery in their schools.
Content provided by 
School Climate & Safety Webinar Engaging Every Student: How to Address Absenteeism and Build Belonging
Gain valuable insights and practical solutions to address absenteeism and build a more welcoming and supportive school environment.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.

Read Next

Law & Courts Legal Fights Highlight Clashes Over Transgender 69´«Ã½â€™ Pronouns in 69´«Ã½
A federal court weighs the case of a teacher who refused to use students' chosen names and pronouns, as similar questions arise elsewhere.
9 min read
John Kluge, a former Indiana teacher, pictured in an undated photo.
John M. Kluge is an Indiana teacher who was dismissed for refusing to use transgender students' chosen names and pronouns.
Courtesy of Alliance Defending Freedom
Law & Courts Can Parents Opt Kids Out of 69´«Ã½ LGBTQ+ Books? The Supreme Court Will Decide
The U.S. Supreme Court will take up a school district's policy of refusing to let parents opt out their children from LGBTQ+ storybooks.
3 min read
The Supreme Court on Wednesday afternoon, April 19, 2023, in Washington.
A view of the Supreme Court in the afternoon on April 19, 2023, in Washington.
Jacquelyn Martin/AP
Law & Courts How Educators Feel About the Supreme Court's Decision to Uphold TikTok Ban
The Supreme Court upheld a law targeting TikTok, increasing the uncertainty for an app highly popular among U.S. educators and students.
6 min read
Sarah Baus, left, of Charleston, S.C., and Tiffany Cianci, who says she is a "long-form educational content creator," livestream to TikTok outside the Supreme Court, on Jan. 10, 2025, in Washington.
Sarah Baus, left, of Charleston, S.C., and Tiffany Cianci, who says she is a "long-form educational content creator," livestream to TikTok outside the Supreme Court, on Jan. 10, 2025, in Washington.
Jacquelyn Martin/AP
Law & Courts After 50 Years, This School District Is No Longer Segregated, Court Says
A federal appeals court panel declared that the Tucson, Ariz., district was now legally desegregated a half century after it was first sued.
3 min read
Scales of justice and Gavel on wooden table and Lawyer or Judge working with agreement in Courtroom, Justice and Law concept.
Pattanaphong Khuankaew/iStock